Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ttt0
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
60 ms
·
661.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
For example in EU banks are legally required to provide you a basic service. I don't see how this is contradictory to freedom of speech. > What about a property on a busy road - a sign there has more impact than a sign at a house of
662.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
It's a problem, because it doesn't end here. Even if you make your own service, once your "club" gains too much traction you are still going to be deplatformed by domain registers, DDoS protection services, payment proce
663.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
That's actually pretty funny, I did click on that warning on some voter fraud allegations and here is what it said: What you need to know - Voter fraud of any type is incredibly rare in the US, according to The Associated Pre
664.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
People are dying from Covid in every country, regardless of who's in charge and what the approach is. Maybe I'm just crazy, but I really don't think that people would just magically stop dying under Biden.
665.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
The objective reality exists and there are legitimate reasons for people wanting to have nothing to do with this company. Not everything is a bias.
666.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
mpv + youtube-dl and RSS as replacement for subscriptions.
667.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
> It takes technical knowledge to overcome that measure. (Go ahead, ask any non-techie you know to download a copy of a video from Youtube without using a tool like youtube-dl. They'll fail.) Go to the Taylor Swift music video, open
668.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
Hey, what's that? https://github.com/l1ving/youtube-dl/blob/master/youtube_dl/... So if you open devtools in your web browser and go to the Network tab, where you can manually download all audi
669.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
The alleged "circumvention code" is just a JavaScript interpreter.
670.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
It also doesn't mean that we all have to refuse him the platform to be an asshole. Giving him the platform seems like exactly what Spotify wants to do, and since we all reached the consensus that private corporations are free to do wha
671.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
A person is not content. Alex Jones is not InfoWars podcast. I haven't listened to the podcast in question, because why would I, but if you think that it does violate these rules, you should prove it.
672.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
Does that standard also apply to services like, for example, GitHub? Do you think that we shouldn't ever question if Microsoft would start kicking off open source projects for arbitrary reasons?
673.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
> the issue at hand is the inclusion of youtube links in the readme, which encourages downloads of copyrighted works from youtube. The README file doesn't encourage any downloads of any copyrighted works. All examples included in th
674.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
It's not a "limited few". I think most of the Eastern Europe allows downloading copyrighted content for personal use.
675.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
The point is that they provide the tool for clients to decrypt the URL. And youtube-dl is a YouTube client, just like Chrome or Firefox is. If you have a key to a locked house, unlocking the door doesn't mean that you "circumvente
676.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
I mean, sure, but the argument is that it circumvents the protection measures. If you willingly give someone a dedicated tool that decrypts your content, I just don't understand in what world using it is considered to be a circumventio
677.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
The content itself is not encrypted in any way as far as I know. They encrypt some kind of URL, to the actual content I think. If this is truly the case, then every web browser that can access YouTube and supports JavaScript is guilty as we
678.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
> It is whether youtube-dl is a tool that enables access to YouTube contents by circumventing a "cipher". YouTube provides a javascript to decrypt it and youtube-dl just runs it. Unless they are arguing that using a JS interpre
679.
▲
by
ttt0
6y ago
It's not DRM. It can't be DRM, obfuscation is never a valid measure to restrict access. The purpose of obfuscation is the opposite, it makes sure that you can still for example run the obfuscated code, but it's just hard to u