ttt0

29 ms·

271.
by ttt0 6y ago
Somewhat relevant, content creators from outside the US are going to be taxed by the US government. https://twitter.com/YouTubeCreators/status/13693446469089361...
272.
by ttt0 6y ago
It's not a political ideology or political speech. The reason we came up with freedom of speech is primarily so you can criticize the people in power. I know that people for whatever reason got this weird idea that pornography is someh
273.
by ttt0 6y ago
I don't get any of it, and that leads me to think that you might be projecting, but ok. I think the fact that you said 'owning the libs' speaks for itself. We should end this discussion as it isn't going anywhere down: d
274.
by ttt0 6y ago
Every white person has a white privilege and thus is racist and benefits from white supremacy. Same difference. The left doesn't hate white people, they just hate 90% of them. Colorblindness (aka. not being racist by the old definition
275.
by ttt0 6y ago
In the archive. > One person was hit by a car in downtown Louisville, Kentucky, early on June 17 as protesters held an anti-racism demonstration at Jefferson Square, police said.
276.
by ttt0 6y ago
So I can write an article about rapists, put a completely unrelated picture of your face with your full name on it, and that's not a smear? That's essentially what happened
277.
by ttt0 6y ago
https://archive.is/ilHur > One person was hit by a car in downtown Louisville, Kentucky, early on June 17 as protesters held an anti-racism demonstration at Jefferson Square, police said. The story might be unrelated, bu
278.
by ttt0 6y ago
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9352639/Bi-racial-h...
279.
by ttt0 6y ago
I'm pretty sure he's not the one who's falling into a trap here, precisely for the reasons you mentioned.
280.
by ttt0 6y ago
Remember when NPR deliberately took a video out of context to portray peaceful protesters attacking a random car as if the driver was some sort of white supremacist who tried to hit them on purpose? https://thefederalist.com&#x2F
281.
by ttt0 6y ago
> It's a similar problem to the whole anti-fa thing. Both have groups organizing around a common idea. [...] Neither are a strict group that exists with a coherent ideology you can point to. Instead they are a name given to lots of
282.
by ttt0 6y ago
That'd definitely be an improvement, but you still have backdoors on your CPU brought to you by Intel(tm).
283.
by ttt0 6y ago
Boogaloos are far-right only in the sense that they're libertarians afaik. > Video shot that night shows a person later identified as Hunter firing 13 rounds from a semiautomatic assault-style rifle on the 3rd precinct police statio
284.
by ttt0 6y ago
You mean like corporatism? I don't think I ever saw anyone arguing for that besides left-wingers. Not explicitly at least. Or do you mean fascist as a slur, ie. anything I don't like?
285.
by ttt0 6y ago
A clear case of projection and most likely also a straw man. How else are you supposed to respond to a comment like this?
286.
by ttt0 6y ago
I'm not denying the memes and the edginess, as you can just look at the YouTube channel. But believe it or not, not everything is about you and the 'wokeness'. You think too much of yourself if you think everyone has to defin
287.
by ttt0 6y ago
https://github.com/LukeSmithxyz/based.cooking/issues/64
288.
by ttt0 6y ago
Don't block cookies or use incognito mode. Do everyone a favor and archive the article with archive.is
289.
by ttt0 6y ago
I know what 'based' means. The term originated in hip-hop and now it's used by all sorts of people ranging from nationalists, through moderate conservatives and apolitical people, all the way to communists, in places like ima
290.
by ttt0 6y ago
I'm not old and I hate it. I don't even know how to insert an emoji on a computer.
291.
by ttt0 6y ago
If someone calls a "cringe/unpleasant/racist" thing "cool", then does that mean that one of the meaning of the word "cool" is something "cringe/unpleasant/racist"?
292.
by ttt0 6y ago
Having a YouTube channel with 95% of videos being Linux tutorials is defining your whole identity as anti-woke?
293.
by ttt0 6y ago
Simply recognizing that, let's say, a down syndrome is a genetic defect and something that's generally abnormal does not dehumanize people with down syndrome. Genetic and birth defects are a thing. It's a common scientific te
294.
by ttt0 6y ago
Anomalies and people born with defects do not disprove the overall rule. Just like people being born with 6 fingers do not change the fact that humans have 5 finders at each hand. I'm not sure if there is a name for this type of argume
295.
by ttt0 6y ago
I don't really agree with the biological sex thing, as the rules of how reproduction works are generally pretty straightforward and pretty much the same across most of the mammal species. But it's beside the point. My question is
296.
by ttt0 6y ago
The copyright holder didn't delist the books, eBay did. From wsj: > Online marketplace eBay Inc. said it is working to prevent the resale of six Dr. Seuss books that were pulled earlier this week by the company in charge of the late
297.
by ttt0 6y ago
First of all, you're mixing up opinions and actions. Two completely different things. Second, I think of tolerance as a personal thing. But on a level of society or government, that you're talking about - I don't know, you te
298.
by ttt0 6y ago
It's fine, just don't call yourself "tolerant". It's doublespeak, just like how the word "racism" is used today
299.
by ttt0 6y ago
You said it like it's an unthinkable thing to do, but it used to be a policy - FCC fairness doctrine.
300.
by ttt0 6y ago
What's even more amusing is that the right views the left as hypocrites too, because they were previously against it. Seems like everyone is a hypocrite. I was convinced that it's a good thing that the right is most impacted by th

More ›