ttpphd

15 ms·

121.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Money makes people do strange things.
122.
by ttpphd 4y ago
I don't do my science by faith.
123.
by ttpphd 4y ago
About 8 months ago :)
124.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Yes I do that, thank you. Thanks for clearly stating how journal prestige is harmful to academics and scientists.
125.
by ttpphd 4y ago
That's not a problem to be fixed through fake journal prestige.
126.
by ttpphd 4y ago
In other words, the people who are afraid of reputational loss are the ones who have benefited the most from the broken system of academic publishing. I won't cry for them.
127.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Lolol Yeah we have. It's called reading the paper and applying judgement.
128.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Interesting! I did something similar with 12+ years of my writing in an attempt to understand the trajectories of my attitudes. Downloaded my Reddit data and ran some extra processing to contextualize my comments within as much of the origi
129.
by ttpphd 4y ago
The same people who made PLoS are the ones reforming eLife. Exact same.
130.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Ugh stop. Not every conversation has to be about GPT.
131.
by ttpphd 4y ago
The whole point is that journal prestige is harmful and fake. It's prestige by association. That's not how science should work.
132.
by ttpphd 4y ago
This is adorable but not at all informative
133.
by ttpphd 4y ago
The easiest hack is the social hack.
134.
by ttpphd 4y ago
If one side of your business is ingesting data, is the other side excreting it?
135.
by ttpphd 4y ago
"I don't spend much time worrying about AI ethics" Maybe you should re-evaluate whether that's the right choice based on your own comment, especially when ethics and safety experts are being fired by big tech co.
136.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Learn sign language ;)
137.
by ttpphd 4y ago
This sounds like a reflexive take without any thought about what science actually is.
138.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Hi you are describing my game, Lexicode. https://greatfilter.itch.io/lexicode I am currently remaking it as a web app rather than a unity app.
139.
by ttpphd 4y ago
I made this in Jan 2022. It's prior art, but I was learning Unity at the time so it is a little janky. In my oh so very humble opinion as its creator, a better guessing game because of the initial hint tuning. https://greatf
140.
by ttpphd 4y ago
The image made me laugh!
141.
by ttpphd 4y ago
You are just being silly and argumentative now.
142.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Wow, good thing that I literally linked to the primary sources AND an additional secondary source for background. Y'all need to see context.
143.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Not breaking any of those rules, but it could be argued that y'all are breaking the one about tangential annoyances. My comment was good. It provided primary source material and supplementary background material, then provided a clearl
144.
by ttpphd 4y ago
My only reaction is extreme amusement. The idea that there is some sacred collection of words we must keep pure is funny.
145.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Here's some relevant background: https://physicsworld.com/a/cosmological-coupling-is-making-b... And the two papers mentioned in the OP: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-82
146.
by ttpphd 4y ago
This is very helpful, thank you!
147.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Glad that there's more choice, but I couldn't find any features that I don't already have in zotero.
148.
by ttpphd 4y ago
You skimmed the book, but didn't read it. I don't think you are the person whose review I'll take seriously.
149.
by ttpphd 4y ago
You certainly are having a reaction to it, but you aren't persuading me that he's full of shit
150.
by ttpphd 4y ago
Ah I see thank you for explaining that.

More ›