Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ttiurani
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
Raph Levien, who's behind Druid and Xilem ( https://raphlinus.github.io/rust/gui/2022/05/07/ui-architect... ) UI frameworks, recently gave a talk about very similar issues. Slides here: https:&#
62.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
> [T]echnology is about taking what’s out there in the world, and harnessing it for human purposes. Technology is indeed about transforming existing nature into utility and producing waste thrown back into nature. Knowing what we know ab
63.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
A team of 10 devs I was a part of got lots of everyday value from JSON schemas (w/ code generation) being the single source of truth of the domain model for a Typescript frontend and Java backend. I would absolutely choose JSON schemas
64.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
> As soon as students raised a hue and cry over some issue — any issue — the administrators just rolled over, as though they were not actually in charge of the institutions they nominally oversaw. If the students and their parents pay th
65.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
> A few thousand It's around 5000 per hour , well over a million new active users this month. https://mastodon.social/@atomicpoet/109368148529393065
66.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
The title is a bit misleading. (Maybe even deliberately so, given this is FT.) This story is about the recent surprise bestsellers by Kohei Saito in Japan. While Saito does argue for "degrowth communism", marxism is not the only w
67.
▲
Degrowth – Marxism is back for the modern age
(ft.com)
2 points
by
ttiurani
4y ago
|
1 comments
68.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
After reading the replies I believe this dynamic is real, but from my own opposite experiences, not universal. I asked my feminist wife about this and she said the reason she isn't put off by vulnerable men is partly because her father
69.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
For me, becoming a generalist has been driven by broad curiosity across many schools of thought – not limited to just software nor even technology. I can't even imagine a world where I would have been content specializing. One upside t
70.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
> See, the scope and purpose of something changes faster than its name can. There's your problem. Create libraries that aim to do one thing and do it well. Once you release your project and have users that depend on your code, you o
71.
▲
Hear 'Consume', Think 'Ravage'
(tiuraniemi.org)
12 points
by
ttiurani
4y ago
|
4 comments
72.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
> Most systems in this era of cheap hardware are single user, BUT NOT ALL SYSTEMS OP quite clearly argues that multi-user systems can still have the old behavior if they so choose with explicit configuration. OP makes an argument about w
73.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
For posterity this is a complete misunderstanding of everything degrowth. There's a whole book about this particular disingenuous Malthusian accusation but here's the gist: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2021/04
74.
▲
One Year After I Quit My Job for Activism
(tiuraniemi.org)
2 points
by
ttiurani
4y ago
|
2 comments
75.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
Another name for this is JWCC. IMO very good argument for this feature set here: https://nigeltao.github.io/blog/2021/json-with-commas-commen...
76.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
I wrote this very quickly as just one comment among dozens of very different comments, so I really didn't expect to get the attention. It's much harder to write with plain words about these topics, so that's the reason for al
77.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
Thanks, sent you an email!
78.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
There is no easy answer, and making a change this big is a monumental task. Personally I've still come to think that just because making this change is very hard, that's not an excuse for me to not try, because the alternative is
79.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
None of them are system changes. Yes, 1 and 3 would be fantastic – although switching to electric without at the same time reducing SOVs is IMO very inadequate if you take int account all of the planetary boundaries, not just climate change
80.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
I know I'm going to get downvoted for this, but the answer to your question depends on your analysis of the problem. If you're an ecomodernist, who believes we can stop and reverse the transgression of planetary boundaries (climat
81.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
> It is actually a good idea regarding decentralization. I absolutely agree: hypercore, their DHT and holepunching work is excellent. My frustration stems from the fact that nothing in the innovative part of Keet needs cryptocurrencies.
82.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
Any mention of bitcoins typically means a full-on commitment to cryptocurrencies. And I don't think I was wrong, because found out only later that this is funded by Tether and Bitfinex. The actual purpose of this project seems to be to
83.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
The bitcoin support is a huge red flag for me. I really hope they scrap that.
84.
▲
Hosting on a Raspberry Pi in My Living Room
(tiuraniemi.org)
1 points
by
ttiurani
4y ago
|
0 comments
85.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
Sveltekit with typescript and adapter-static. Sveltekit scales down very well: if you need only CSS and HTML for some paths, that's all you write in your svelte files, and that's also all users download. At the same time if for so
86.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
Reminder that the problem isn't just "too much GHG", but crossing most planetary boundaries[1] at the same time. I get why MIT has done the research, but this publicity is poised to create yet another distraction and delay ne
87.
▲
by
ttiurani
4y ago
I'm not a fan of his by any means, but want to still give my N=1 counter example: I have disagreed with PG on Twitter, and also pointed out errors in his logic and facts a bunch of times, and haven't been blocked.
88.
▲
by
ttiurani
5y ago
I'm with on on this, and agree wholeheartedly that fighting overconsumption is a system change, which needs a big political win (see my response on a sibling comment). At the same time, I do have a little hope that commenting this here
89.
▲
by
ttiurani
5y ago
I agree that it can be possible to live sustainably in a house, like you described (and I gave that list mostly to spark the imagination, not as absolutes). But big lands with very few people living on them, is very hard to do at scale, esp
90.
▲
by
ttiurani
5y ago
Those were just a few examples to spark the imagination, not categorical demands for everyone, and there are indeed many caveats. Furthermore, even though I did address individuals in the above points, going after overconsumption needs a sy
More ›