Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tsol
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
63 ms
·
931.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
This is always true, and yet dictators have existed since the dawn of humanity. I don't know why people expect Russians to function like a hivemind, rather than humans that disagree and have instincts for self preservation
932.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
It's especially funny because when pressed on war crimes committed by their governments with their tax dollars, they will day "well listen it's not my fault our army did that, I'm not in charge! There's nothing I ca
933.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
The army has bullets stockpiled. If Russians refuses to run any factories starting today the war would still be on. It's not hard to find arms if you have money-- which Putin has
934.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
There are dictators doing crazy things all around the world, you just hear about this one more.
935.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
>to quickly de-escalate a protest that was anything but peaceful. It wasn't exactly violent either. Better hope you never have to actually use violence against a corrupt system
936.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
The United States would also face huge shortages and other problems if they couldn't trade with China. China also realizes that too-- it's a two way street. Globalization makes everyone vulnerable
937.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
Nicotinic acid gives you a six pack? Where's the reasoning there?
938.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
I find sleep masks help me to get the full 8 hours. Without being able to sense light, I guess my body assumes it should still be asleep and I usually don't wake up early. It doesn't work every time, but it works often enough for
939.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
I disagree. There are highly respected political scientists that disagree such as John Mearsheimer of University of Chicago. Here's an article from the New Yorker; https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/why-j
940.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
Sure.. but I don't know why capitulation isn't an option-- again if the chief concern is nuclear war then why should we resist to the precipice of a world war? That's the puzzle piece that doesn't fit-- how we're ma
941.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
>but why should we say "bad luck, let him have them and let's buy more gas" The whole point of my post was responding to the idea that "we must oppose Russia to prevent nuclear war". If that's the real objec
942.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
Yes that's my point, that is capitulation to Russia for us. To not get involved.
943.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
Independent news sources are rare in Russia, especially with the recent law making "misinformation" a jailable offense with up to 15 years jail time. I'm not saying there isn't any other news sources, but it legitimately
944.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
Whether or not it's half, whether or not they really believed every word.. a majority still supported Trump such that he was elected president of the United States. How much his supporters actually believe is irrelevant at that point
945.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
>Supporting these affected nations is a win for all involved, except Russia. We should prevent them from going into recession, enable them to reduce their dependence on Russia, while strengthening our relationship with them. I mean.. do
946.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
And western people are responsible for a culture that colonizes half the world. Why do you always escape punishment?
947.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
Maybe this is very American of me to say-- but what about them? They have freedom of speech even if it's not something I agree with. We don't throw everyone who calls themselves nazis into jail.. why try to punish everyone who mig
948.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
>We decided to do this due to the heavy cyber component to this war and the chance of manipulated content The ironic thing is, this can apply to most of reddit. If they were really so worried they should shut down the entire site as it&#
949.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
>This isn't about equality or justice or whatever here. This is about economic power, who has it and who doesn't. The reason we oppose the Ukraine war is because of economic power? That's not the reasoning being used to ju
950.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
I mean it's not a condition, but it is a associated health risk. I think they just wrote that out a little weird
951.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
Do we know this move is by the Russian regime? Contrast that with, say, Anonymous taking down government websites. It's engaging in cyber warfare as well, but that doesn't reflect on the military so much as the American public
952.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
As a Muslim.. I can lmao
953.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
>country who's main exports are not drugs or oil. Afghanistan supplies drugs(opium poppy) to pharmaceutical companies for turning into American painkillers. I don't know why it should matter if a countries main export is oil an
954.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
>The main reason was to cease doing business with a nation behaving in brutal and barbaric ways we have long considered completely and utterly unacceptable Drone striking middle eastern children didn't do it for you? Something about
955.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
I'm pretty sure it'll just end up being pirated by those who can, and those who can't will just move on. I don't see parents waging a revolution because they can't get Disney. Media can be easily substituted if it&#
956.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
Unfortunately that also removes the possibility of using American media such as Disney as a cultural weapon. IMO it's further splitting the two worlds and making it only more likely to end in animosity
957.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
I don't know how people keep missing this. It's especially ironic, considering we just came from 4 years of hearing "I hate Trump he's not my president I wish we could kick him out but my voice is too small".
958.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
Asian immigrants are privileged? They have high of poverty, this is a weird take just because some Asians are well to do
959.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
That's the hope, but it also feels a lot like Germany after WWI. Sometimes cutting countries off from your sphere of influence and being overly harsh just ends up radicalizing people more. It's strange to me how little discussion
960.
▲
by
tsol
5y ago
>this is about a nation-state unilaterally deciding that it should attempt to DESTROY a neighbor for the sake of a few natural resources When did this become about America? /s I find it funny, as a Muslim, to see how little discussi
More ›