>but why should we say "bad luck, let him have them and let's buy more gas" The whole point of my post was responding to the idea that "we must oppose Russia t

>but why should we say "bad luck, let him have them and let's buy more gas" The whole point of my post was responding to the idea that "we must oppose Russia to prevent nuclear war". If that's the real objective, then yes it makes sense to say "well too bad" and but intervene like we do in Tigray and most of the conflicts around the world. I don't see why this particular human rights violation is inexcusable when there are children dying in areas that we are more directly responsible for(ie Iraq or Afghanistan)