tscs37

37 ms·

331.
by tscs37 9y ago
So just because we don't have yet means we will never? Oh my, I think that might be a fallacy. Not that you are wrong because of that but you are wrong for different reasons. Possibly because Star Trek has little to do with an Übermens
332.
by tscs37 9y ago
The first amendment only exists in the US and only started existing well after democracy was invented.
333.
by tscs37 9y ago
>these people want others dead, removed, or subjugated purely because they're different. And the other sports team just wants different things to be done. Admittedly not as drastic... yet. >And that is something that in 2017, the
334.
by tscs37 9y ago
No, mainly because only literal Nazis are banned. You may hold any opinion which does not violate the dignity of humans, no matter right or left. And we do have a fairly active right and far right.
335.
by tscs37 9y ago
Some people don't understand computers at all. Teaching them to engineer software, for example, can be a long and expensive undertaking. Which these people might not be interested in since they are good in other things. I think it&#x27
336.
by tscs37 9y ago
Curiously, I think the DADA is probably a safer job consider you survive most of a year on average.
337.
by tscs37 9y ago
>they just think that reddit banning a pro-racism community or a internet infra company refusing to serve a neo-nazi website basically means that we live in an authoritarian society. No, I think it's unhealthy and may lead to such a
338.
by tscs37 9y ago
The way it was phrased, it definitely was. And especially as a german I am not comfortable with some of the solutions proposed in this entire thread.
339.
by tscs37 9y ago
What if you can't take it down? What if they end up on Tor? And tbh, this does sound very aggressive and Nazi-like; round up the [group we don't like] and exterminate. It's quite a hateful philosphy to have.
340.
by tscs37 9y ago
UEFI is more complex but also nicer for management. Developing a runtime on UEFI is easy to setup and get going, you don't have that feature in coreboot.
341.
by tscs37 9y ago
Why core boot? Uefi is open source (edk, tiano) if you make it so. Coreboot is also very x86 centric last I checked.
342.
by tscs37 9y ago
That's a rather narrow mindset. As previously explained, security is not binary, even in the circumstances you mentioned. I don't know all the players in the. Surveillance industry but I'm not as paranoid to believe they are
343.
by tscs37 9y ago
Humans don't work by actual risk and rather by perceived risk.
344.
by tscs37 9y ago
There is secure on mobile. Secure is not a binary property, it's a spectrum of options and possibilities which heavily depend on your environment and your threat model. You either get security updates at the possible downside of send
345.
by tscs37 9y ago
You should install security updates. Period. You don't help anyone by feeling better because instead of having the vendor maybe sniff on you, a hacker can do it instead. I also haven't found any apps yet that intentionally waste m
346.
by tscs37 9y ago
Your phone will probably turn up in a botnet soon enough, but atleast you had the moral high ground.
347.
by tscs37 9y ago
Yeah it's basically the only way you should be doing LTS.
348.
by tscs37 9y ago
> They keep old releases in their CI configuration and block PR’s from being merged if they don’t work on older release lines. If you are doing that, shame on you, that's not how stable and long-term-support works at all. If you bac
349.
by tscs37 9y ago
It doesn't really, only when you need to hide subdomains for security reasons. Which you shouldn't do. CT raises the bar for attackers since they will be logged into the CT if they try to MitM. Any other attack is not made easier
350.
by tscs37 9y ago
This is quite neat. I'll probably look at the go-library to build something out of that. In the meanwhile, crt.sh also offers a Atom feed of issued certificates. Definitely not realtime but also works.
351.
by tscs37 9y ago
You should not expect a service which has been exposed to the open internet to be hidden. If your last defense is that nobody knows the domainname, then you've lost. Not knowing the domainname shouldn't be any defense at all.
352.
by tscs37 9y ago
I believe Tom Scott (YouTuber) also proposed a vomit Modifier. Vomit poop emoji is really disgusting stuff.
353.
by tscs37 9y ago
I think this is one of the strongest pros for using OVH; YOU get the abuse letters and as someone operating a internet service it is YOUR responsibility, legal and otherwise, to deal with them. This means if the abuse letters are ignore
354.
by tscs37 9y ago
Considering the ePrivacy Law and the GDPR in the EU both being on track for becoming enforcing, I think the EU would be a good contender on reigning in facebook. The US seems largely content with making almost pyrrhic victories on this fron
355.
by tscs37 9y ago
Tbh, this doesn't look like something that could scale to Tbps Bandwidths... It seems a lot of processing is required to properly route the packet to the next hop and that happens independently of whether the next hop is even remotely
356.
by tscs37 9y ago
That sounds like a good way to get very inefficient routing. Supposed I have keypair A at a friend and keypair B for me, how is cjdns going to find the fastest route between me and my friend?
357.
by tscs37 9y ago
>I would say equality vote is very important it was missing in this country not long ago. If you mean equality of vote; it's just another version of equality of chance. Everyone gets a chance to vote and be voted for, the outcome ma
358.
by tscs37 9y ago
re: measures of humanity; I meant humanity as in the species, not as a quality. >The root question is do the ends justify the means? I do not believe the ends will ever justify the means, but that is just my opinion on the matter. >Do
359.
by tscs37 9y ago
Stuff like this is why I usually double check and only access disk by anything but the /dev/sdx or /dev/hdx labels; too easy to blow up in your face.
360.
by tscs37 9y ago
It really doesn't matter what your group does, it matters how the public views your group. If your group is actually violent or not doesn't matter at all. I think for the intents and purposes of the dicussion, when mentioning BLM

More ›