Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tryonenow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
61.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
I imagine if it were deadlier, people would have been more incentivised to deal with it. Bodies piling up on the streets is a much better motivator for staying inside and socially distancing than news reports of regional hospitals being gra
62.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
The trouble is that even if these facts are unambiguously correct, their reporting can be misleading, by interpretation, implication, conjecture, selective reporting, and/or omission. That's how bias is injected even into "fa
63.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
No, not every conjecture has been researched. But if you're at all familiar with editorial policy on wikipedia, you'll know that only mainstream sources are typically treated as WP:reliablesource (e.g. wapo, huffpo, cnn, nbc, occa
64.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
And how laughable, given wikipedia's heavy progressive bias. These people seek out and peddle victimhood as currency. Truly McArthy-esque, to see villains (in our times "oppressors") behind every shadow... Even manufactured s
65.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>Comvined with the fact that most EU countries have much lower crime rate than US and have no death penalty Comparing US to EU is not valid in this context because we have different demographics and culture surrounding most criminality i
66.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
The fact that crime still exists doesn't mean that public, extreme, and/or gruesome punishment doesn't act like a deterrent which reduces the frequency of crime. I'm not saying that inhumane punishments it necessarily ju
67.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
It's a humorous allusion to the death penalty.
68.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
Come on...this is just money laundering...right?
69.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
Institutional and retail investors are just starting to pile on and there will be potentially massive gains to be had in the near to mid term before the bottom falls out. Long term? Probably not smart. Safe to get in now? Debatable, pretty
70.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>This is a well-respected publication commenting on a matter of great importance that injected false information into it. And the [likely politically deliberate] regularity with which this has been happening for years makes me very uneas
71.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
I have very little long term faith in BTC at this point. It is effectively centralized, has limited capacity, outrageous fees when the network is busy, and then there are growing concerns over environmental impact...but I'm still holdi
72.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>I often find it "justifying human exceptionalism" presented as science. The unstated assumption is that humans are somehow better than chimpanzee You find it unscientific to observe that humans are exceptional for being the on
73.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>I believe the bias generally comes from the sources - "reputable" (and generally liberal) English language sources tend to take a deferential tone towards Obama It's much worse than that. The vast majority of sources that
74.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
I can see how it's "funny" if one is trying to minimize and deflect, but if they're hanging around characters like maduro then they're probably referring to more than just economic or government theory - these peopl
75.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
Because the only place you really need them is in mathematical/scientific computing, and while many scientists tend to pick up a little programming for their research, the vast majority of computer scientists and programmers, in part
76.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
This isn't whataboutism, it's a valid question considering BTC is touted as a replacement for the financial system and ostensibly performs a similar function with an alternative infrastructure. If the premise is that we should sto
77.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
In the experiment, the crystals were driven by RF excitation. Do time crystals generally require a constant energy source to oscillate? I would assume not, since they're called crystals... Also, is the oscillation frequency temperature
78.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>Because we have people pretending it's new so they can drum up outrage and gain power. Because we have people playing the victim after being fired for being intolerable to work with This is the mindset at fault. This idea that into
79.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>the world wants brainless consumers - what is better than someone with sensory disorders, who can be primed to get up and buy with a simple prick? That's a pretty broad and inaccurate generalization of autism spectrum disorders. If
80.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
Venting is healthy, the clip of the woman talking about being picked on seems pretty benign - honestly I'm sure many of the outraged parents have said and done worse things. I understand the optics are bad but maybe they shouldn't
81.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>Facebook has come clean on a slight error in how it presented video view time on its platform. A mismatch in how average video view time is calculated and how it is defined — resulting in that number being reportedly inflated by a trivi
82.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>I deeply failed as an ally during the unionization era at Gimlet,” he wrote. “I did not intend to stop the unionization effort, and I am very glad it succeeded … I’m not done working, but I don’t think anyone needs me taking up space ri
83.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>We may see price inflation of consumer goods and labor too, although that is less clear. How is inflation not inevitable given the massive amount of money the government has just printed in such a short amount of time? What's a saf
84.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
This is about as needlessly hyperbolic as claiming that everyone on the left wants to see the US turn to socialism complete with "reeducation" camps for anyone right of center. You lack perspective.
85.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
A single cold snap is no more evidence for climate change than it is against global warming. The earth is huge, climate is chaotic and oscillatory with large variance, you need many data points over, at a minimum, decades (though centuries
86.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
Depends on how much of a cushion you have saved. There's always a risk that you'll overestimate your value, or have more difficulty in interviews (which aren't quite like work) than you'd anticipate, or the market will t
87.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
Tangent but probably related: it really bugs me that ceddit and removeddit both no longer function, and I suspect reddit deliberately changed its API to nuke that window into reddit's censorship.
88.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
>He clearly holds disgust for his subject, which ruins his ability to speak impartially about this topic I wonder if you share the same disdain for these very same behaviors within modern "journalism" that Glenn discusses in th
89.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
I don't think those with neutral perspectives have much incentive to comment.
90.
▲
by
tryonenow
6y ago
The fundamental problem with this article is that it restricts it's analysis to a model composed of a single neural network. Any "general intelligence" will undoubtedly come from a complex of neural networks, much like the hu
More ›