troupo

26 ms·

751.
by troupo 8mo ago
There are other 120Hz displays than Apple's. There are even 240Hz displays. IIRC Apple couldn't get above 60Hz even on third-party displays they explicitly advertised.
752.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Apple is the only company that truly gets HIDPI desktop displays with high quality gloss and 200+ ppi at screen this large. And somehow they completely forgot how to seamlessly work with displays in general. Connect multiple displays v
753.
by troupo 8mo ago
> If anything they'll push regulations that make them illegal to own. And this inane take is based on what exactly? Not on recent regulations that literally force companies to open up and interoperate?
754.
by troupo 8mo ago
A mess as in: it just works?
755.
by troupo 8mo ago
> W3C are dragging their feet on WebNFC They are not "dragging their feet". Chrome implemented NFC, vomited out a semblance of a standard and said "there, it's standard now". Who cares about objections from other
756.
by troupo 8mo ago
> It doesn't just take a single photo of your face. It takes a scan of it i.e. multiple shots. I never knew you can only upload one photo to a website ever. Or that you can only process one photo at a time on the server. > Yes it
757.
by troupo 8mo ago
> The ETA app gives you fast feedback on whether or not photos that you need to provide are any good, handles state, retries, talks to the NFC in your passport, handles long running workflows and validation etc. Apart from NFC all of tha
758.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Are you saying those frameworks aren't impressive because they are also powered by Vite? That is not what I'm saying > That's the most important result of this experiment. They achieved something that they'd want
759.
by troupo 8mo ago
Because of literally years of terrorist acts from Hamas? Because the action initially had overwhelming public support? Because, as any military action without proper planning, they promised a quick victory and had no plans beyond "bomb
760.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Because the West doesn't fund and shield the perpetrators unlike Israel. Who do you think supplies the weapons to most of the world's conflicts? They just appear out of thin air?
761.
by troupo 8mo ago
Two things are valid at once: - Hamas is a terrorist organization that planned and executed a mass terror campaign, fully knowing and hoping for the reaction. And boasting about it continuously and repeatedly. - Israel's response was h
762.
by troupo 8mo ago
Here's what is buried a bit in the text: --- start quote --- Something like 95% of vinext is pure Vite. The routing, the module shims, the SSR pipeline, the RSC integration: none of it is Cloudflare-specific. --- end quote --- The real
763.
by troupo 8mo ago
Revenue is not profit. All we know about Stripe is that it's "robustly profitable": https://assets.stripeassets.com/fzn2n1nzq965/3LlGw839Q6kUwxZ... Adyen reported 500 million EUR in pure profit: https:&
764.
by troupo 8mo ago
The nature of these tools is that you tell them not to jump off a cliff, so they ride the bicycle over it. Or a car. Or "you're completely right. I assumed it was possible to fly". Or...
765.
by troupo 8mo ago
> I agree that DPA:s, as they are written today, aren't good. That is, multiple regulations already explicitly restrict the amount of data you can collect and pass on to third parties. And yet you're here saying "it&#x27
766.
by troupo 8mo ago
> We have a long list of subprocessors, but any one individual going through our system is only going to interact with two or three at most. So, in aggregate, all 17 data leeches are getting info. They are not getting info on all you
767.
by troupo 8mo ago
I don't use Facebook much, and my feed is filled with algorithmic bullshit and almost no posts from friends, family, or groups I'm a part of.
768.
by troupo 8mo ago
> OneTrust is literally a consent management platform focused on regulatory compliance, and 24 Hour Fitness is using it to violate consent regulations. I mean, OneTrust's entire raison d'etre is to violate consent regulations
769.
by troupo 8mo ago
There are companies that still use jQuery, or Angular, or Ember, or vanilla JS, or Blazor, or... Just because tech exists and is usable doesn't mean it doesn't have a list of issues and footguns a mile long, some of which are exp
770.
by troupo 8mo ago
> I've looked at lit quite a bit but never fully understood the "why". Because people don't want to write hundreds of lines of useless boilerplate by hand. Web Components API is verbose enough that you want to handle
771.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Lit started as an alternative to Polymer? Yes. Lit is "fully backwards incompatible [with] Polymer"? No, Lit and Polymer work just fine together because they both make web components. Keyword: make . Again: you keep pretendi
772.
by troupo 8mo ago
So you're deflecting from the original point raised. Anyway, yes. Web Component "community" was fully and willfully ignoring most issues that people (especially framework authors) were talking about for years . At one point
773.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Do you have any concrete examples there? What "mechanics" are you referring to Try the 2022 Web Components Group Report. Including things like "most these issues come from Shadow DOM". > Given that very complex a
774.
by troupo 8mo ago
We're in the discussion under an article about web components. So, web components. Which I literally explicitly called out in my comment.
775.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Is it that Lit gives you a different way of authoring web components than the raw APIs? than the raw APIs, than Polymer, than Stencil, than... > Is it that from the outside the components aren't "Lit", but consumed as
776.
by troupo 8mo ago
Unfortunately, as most of them left Twitter they also temoved all their accounts, so you can only see responses from framework authors like Rich Harris. But here's a very on-brand toot from Alex Russel: https://toot.cafe&#x2
777.
by troupo 8mo ago
The output of lit is. Not lit. Stop pretending this isn't the case
778.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Not being tied to the JavaScript industry upgrade cycle (which is short!), > We currently use Lit for the framework on top These two are contradictory statements. 1. lit is both newer than React, and started as a fully backwards
779.
by troupo 8mo ago
> If you really can't find a use case for web components then you're living in a bubble. There's a very tiny use-case for web components. And even there it's riddled with a huge amount of potential (and actual) footgu
780.
by troupo 8mo ago
> Who are "they"? You sound like you think there's some giant conspiracy against JS frameworks. Yes. There is. The main developers and proselityzers were completely insanely biased against web frameworks (especially React)

More ›