trod1234

81 ms·

661.
by trod1234 2y ago
Rest assured what I said is helpful to the intended target audience. If you believe that, then you probably aren't included in that group. Observations and references to experts and other once common knowledge aren't rants. If you
662.
by trod1234 2y ago
Up to a point they could simply deny that AI couldn't do these things. This allowed them to count users as people for advertising revenue. This industry has long suffered from fraud, but because not enough information is generally prov
663.
by trod1234 2y ago
The people who would have left these platforms for the dangers, have already left. The remainder of people left on these platforms are those that lack the introspection or other natural abilities needed to notice and avoid situations in whi
664.
by trod1234 2y ago
> You don't need to bring up quantum computers. Almost all protocols in the networking ... Its true that those protocols are basically running shared secrets, but those areas all have some visibility with auditing and monitoring. Yo
665.
by trod1234 2y ago
That reasoning is dubious. They aren't saying that more have been hacked, they are saying that more have been discovered related to that hack. Any adversary at this level would be monitoring the news, and would take appropriate actions
666.
by trod1234 2y ago
cluckindan, I say this with earnest and sincere positive regard... Please get some professional help from a place based in external reality. You are clearly deluded and are hallucinating. I didn't mention anything related to NATO, not
667.
by trod1234 2y ago
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/28/openai-whist... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14236401/evidence-o... Do you really think any proper investigation can
668.
by trod1234 2y ago
Agnostic, and you are quite wrong about a lot of things. Wikipedia isn't a valid historic source, this is consistently repeated in introductory college courses and throughout academia. Any derivations you make on unsound data remains u
669.
by trod1234 2y ago
> Sure, anybody can ask anybody else to investigate anything. Have you dealt with government workers before? Do you know any of them that would re-open an investigation on their own from submissions from an independent person that shows
670.
by trod1234 2y ago
They clarified what resources mean in the updates. They also used simplification models which don't account for many of the cascading problems that can't be directly quantified (i.e. dragon king events, debt defaults/ponzi fa
671.
by trod1234 2y ago
Its fairly well known how these things generally happen in a bureaucracy. One word, corruption. Its been known that starting in 1976 PFAS were first found in human blood, and it was rediscovered a second time in the 1990s (at 3M). Obesity h
672.
by trod1234 2y ago
That is not how these things work. The general public can only call for a investigation. For evidence to be actionable it requires a chain of custody that is preserved from an investigation, independents are often not recognized as meeting
673.
by trod1234 2y ago
What about NATO? Surely embedding a remotely triggered off-switch, as a vulnerability for military and commercial trains (and the overall supply chain logistics) would merit some kind of investigation? Can't anyone with an antenna in a
674.
by trod1234 2y ago
It is actually far worse than just corporate greed. It shows an embedded vulnerability into the entire supply chain, a national security issue caused by corruption. They should get awards and payouts for bringing this to light now rather th
675.
by trod1234 2y ago
You are very mistaken, and it shows you haven't studied enough to rationally discuss the subject matter. Of course later, in time, countries impacted more people. Population grows with time, and any rational comparison along these line
676.
by trod1234 2y ago
There is sufficiently convincing evidence for an investigation. People were lured into locations, where they were vulnerable, where they didn't want to participate; where it was by external forces (they had a lack of agency), and then
677.
by trod1234 2y ago
This line of reasoning makes far too many assumptions and falls apart in a conspiracy. Reminds me of TV shows like Dirty Rotten Money, and Damages.
678.
by trod1234 2y ago
Which begs the question, what did he see or could testify about while he was there that is not this, but so much worse? In a conspiracy, all loose ends are cut.
679.
by trod1234 2y ago
In fairness, how would you know anything is true and not delusion when you discard everything that doesn't align with your world view as misinformation? If you followed the same process with just about any piece of news today (from mai
680.
by trod1234 2y ago
There are two aspects of your line of reasoning that don't jive for me. People can choose to not place a bet by not participating in the economy, or tying physical assets to it. In other words, de-banking, off-grid farming, unemploymen
681.
by trod1234 2y ago
As a side note, for a person with a decade of experience in IT, its currently taking roughly 1500 applications per pre-screen interview to give you an idea where the market is at today (and over the past 2 years with the mass adoption of AI
682.
by trod1234 2y ago
Public job board listings have been spammed by fake jobs called ghost jobs. Candidates must overcome that to find real jobs, and the boards in general do not remove said postings. Candidates are forced to identify characterize and remove li
683.
by trod1234 2y ago
I have a very nuanced view on this. While I'm partially glad someone put this together and did this, having seen firsthand what an utter shit show that job hunting has been for the past two years with no offers, dismal conversion ratio
684.
by trod1234 2y ago
You are mistaken in more ways than one. You can't claim wage earners have received a good deal when they are unable to support themselves with basic necessities, let alone a wife and three children (required for risk managing 1 survivi
685.
by trod1234 2y ago
Hi Geo, Interesting. Has he done anything more recently with regards to homemade batteries, or was it just a passing interest? Since this article no longer has comment submissions on the page itself, is it possible to add a little something
686.
by trod1234 2y ago
Agreed. I'd add that functionally dependent software that is used for the items primary purpose, or its features, should also receive little to no protection, and be disclosed up-front. You own the things that you buy.
687.
by trod1234 2y ago
Many of the major harms of these things were neglected, and downplayed even to this day people don't recognize just how changed the world has become. The mere delusion that AI will replace work has been used to justify mass layoffs. Th
688.
by trod1234 2y ago
NewAg is clearly acting with malice and sabotage in mind (as well as extortion), and when it comes to trains and railways this is not just a business matter, it becomes a strategic national security issue. "Wouldn't it be a shame
689.
by trod1234 2y ago
If businesses are unable to regulate themselves, it must be done by law. If copyright is the root of the problem, it may be time to remove that protection; or at least revert it so it is more in-line with patent law expiration. No more auth
690.
by trod1234 2y ago
Rather than Cheating, don't you mean tortuous interference, followed by vexatious litigation? When you intentionally design systems with purpose to delay, but overall sabotage, you show malice and you defraud the purchaser (after-the-f

More ›