tripledry

5 ms·

1.
by tripledry 5d ago
I compare it to math, you can't learn it by reading it you need exercises. Same thing, reading is not sufficient. Just my experience.
2.
by tripledry 5d ago
I dont't really know stats about such things, but I assume the adoption of CC has been insane compared to almost anything, and is also like two years old? Yeah, not surprised. But also, if they all use 500 agents daily and latest model
3.
by tripledry 6d ago
Do you have a link? I would also be very interested in seeing the prompts, from what I've seen you still need to understand the field, maybe I'm wrong.
4.
by tripledry 6d ago
Why is this downvoted? Genuine question, I haven't followed up on the drama.
5.
by tripledry 7d ago
Not only hard to understand, but if one uses it without first understanding the topic, it's a disaster. Couple weeks ago I had someone linking to a doc page in my ticket "Made this summary, hope it helps". It was 100% AI gene
6.
by tripledry 11d ago
True, but that's unfortunately (usually) not because the thing misfired randomly.
7.
by tripledry 11d ago
This is a good point. However, if I put my sci-fi hat on for a second, it's not so far fetched that we figure out a way to compress models to a size where it wouldn't need all that compute.
8.
by tripledry 12d ago
Im very impressed by the technology, I must admit that I didn't expect it to advance this fast. But, at the same time, I'm really tired of there always being some shroud of dishonesty (ex. navier stokes and the two mathematicians
9.
by tripledry 13d ago
I have not experimented that much, my observation is mostly that people seem to have different experiences with the capabilities. Personally I still use mainly Opus and find it handles most tasks quite well (without burning all my corporate
10.
by tripledry 13d ago
I agree with you generally, just an observation on coding specifically. Have the models improved since Opus 4.x? I find the newer models are not better in my day job, maybe in one shotting mvp's and other tasks. Not trying to argue you
11.
by tripledry 15d ago
I agree from a programmers perspective. But from a broad market and product perspective, for most things you don't need to look at the code. If the product kinda does what it's supposed to. For example, in my game projects I don&#
12.
by tripledry 15d ago
What you say is true, the comparison indeed doesn't hold. But is it relevant? does it matter from a product perspective if LLMs are non-deterministic. You don't need to one shot the correct result, english is ambiguous and LLMs no
13.
by tripledry 15d ago
Similar for me, I don't like the development for many reasons, but that's another discussion. I also can't deny the capabilities. I use the tools with this "risk analysis": - If performance doesn't improve I ca
14.
by tripledry 16d ago
classic, now I can have AIs make my games for me while I still have to cook and wash the dishes! Maybe AI can soon start playing the games for me, can't wait.
15.
by tripledry 17d ago
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if they said to him "I will give you a million and your job back after IPO if you resign". To be clear, I don't believe this is what happened here, I'm typing this half jokingly
16.
by tripledry 18d ago
Genuinely interested, which ones do you think have relevance? If I read forums and talk to people IRL most have differing opinions what model is best. Yes, for me it's pretty clear Opus is better than earlier models, but it's at l
17.
by tripledry 21d ago
Also if your entire stack is on the cloud, mess of lambdas and other proprietary services, difficult as hell to follow logs, can't really run locally.
18.
by tripledry 22d ago
In game dev (weirdly enough) I don't think this is true. I was thinking about this yesterday and realized that I don't even want to play only my own games (made by LLMs or me), I explicitly want to experience what other people hav
19.
by tripledry 22d ago
I've been in such a situation for a period in my life, it gets really boring after 1-2 years. But idk, maybe it's different for you.
20.
by tripledry 22d ago
If we truly would get robots with AGI doing anything a human can do but cheaper|better|reliable, it's not comparable at all to history IMO. It's not "a lot of jobs", it's "all jobs".
21.
by tripledry 22d ago
This is why I generally don't trust benchmarks, or anything other than my own experience tbh. It always seems like everyone has a different answer. If we truly had some AGI model, it would probably be fairly obvious to us all no?
22.
by tripledry 23d ago
I think it's arguable that it wouldn't be catastrophic. Doesn't have to be outright lying, it can be something like "opt out" being off by default, and them opting you in at the next update without you noticing. Thi
23.
by tripledry 24d ago
They are probably referring to what Rob said in a presentation. "The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, they’re not researchers. They’re typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C
24.
by tripledry 24d ago
I can think of many reasons, repo access, no LLMs allowed at company, everything needing approval from some department ... It's easy to trivialize the work of others from the outside knowing nothing of the context they work in.
25.
by tripledry 24d ago
> More people hate and getting off Facebook. More people are jumping from Windows to macOS or Linux. Might be true. But here is another angle, thinking about the people I know that are not in tech or avid gamers, which I would say is sti
26.
by tripledry 1mo ago
Indeed, would the advice be good if university was free? Where I live it's basically free and I still sometimes regret not going into the trades. But I suspect this feeling might mostly be a "grass is greener" thing.
27.
by tripledry 1mo ago
Seems to me if technical decisions on the level of "no more AI comments" go through management the organization doesn't know what they are doing. To be fair, I would not be surprised.
28.
by tripledry 1mo ago
Interesting how models become better and beat benchmarks left and right but the user sentiment is actually quite mixed. From forums, live discussions and my own experience it's not obvious that the models have improved much since aroun
29.
by tripledry 1mo ago
> Imagine a world where only one country has AGI/ASI My own bet is that this won't happen with the current race, but that's another discussion. Anyways, bit of a doomer take but if I imagine a world with AGI/ASI, coun
30.
by tripledry 1mo ago
The expert is now outsourced to LLM. If someone asks me about a bug in a system I made N years ago, I usually have a hunch what the problem might be, now it feels I'm lost in my own codebase (even if I really read the code). Similar to

More ›