trio8453

3 ms·

1.
by trio8453 8d ago
But this is about research and we hardly need more cutting edge research into healthy lifestyle. The things that are not known are minutia which barely matters at population level, especially when most of the population isn't even foll
2.
by trio8453 10d ago
I'm not going to argue with you on each point, just wanted to say that you're ignoring the very real possibility of large scale incidents which result not from ill will but from negligence or from not fully understanding the risks
3.
by trio8453 10d ago
What's the difference?
4.
by trio8453 10d ago
I'm not panicking but there are very real risks. If you haven't looked at the stuff that has come out in the past couple of months (like the Huggingface hack and the Navier-Stokes solution) and/or you're dismissing it as
5.
by trio8453 10d ago
> Why does a 6 year old not need any of these guardrails? They're not guardrails, they're a different input/output environment.
6.
by trio8453 13d ago
What if under the no-pause scenario within a couple of years we get cures for N diseases each one of which affects tens or hundreds of millions of people every year - how many years would you wait and keep your hand on the pause button?
7.
by trio8453 13d ago
You can't make up a phrase and then ask us what it means.
8.
by trio8453 13d ago
> We get links like "Why are AI agents lying, cheating and coordinating?" going viral Why would this be a symptom of losing engineering literacy?
9.
by trio8453 13d ago
And it's mostly from lacking vision and a clear direction, not from being behind on research or engineering. For example, Gemini 3.8 Flash is really impressive. But their whole model product line is confusing, even the version numberin
10.
by trio8453 15d ago
No more than any other engineer role, why are you singling out front end?
11.
by trio8453 18d ago
> Do "normies" even know what's happening? No, there are even many non-normies talking about how it's all marketing or try to give balanced take about AI being sometimes a little useful for certain things (but they ca
12.
by trio8453 18d ago
It's a fashion choice.
13.
by trio8453 22d ago
More importantly - why is AGI? Seriously, why does it matter whether we label it that way? With or without the G, these systems can do what they can do either way. If it was some agreed upon term, there would be a point to debate, some cons
14.
by trio8453 26d ago
Is the question helpful? Someone on x said a thing, how would it help if we agreed or disagreed? It's a language, people use it; it's not the most commonly used language but it's certainly gained adoption in the past couple o
15.
by trio8453 1mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis
16.
by trio8453 2mo ago
> prompting very small tasks after you have made the initial design, something along the lines of "Create a database migration that adds column [x], not null", "add a field to the this form that will accept string value, v
17.
by trio8453 2mo ago
> GPT seems to be designed more as a tool. If you want your agent to do what you say without questions and without having its own ideas and agendas you’ll likely prefer it. Lately ChatGPT expresses a lot of opinions and it pretends to be
18.
by trio8453 2mo ago
We've always had bugs. Good chance that it's largely confirmation bias - you're familiar with how software development has changed in the past 6 months, and especially if you don't like it, any time you see a bug or a pr
19.
by trio8453 2mo ago
Realistically, no, this is 10 years too late. The two language problem is way overstated, Python has massive adoption and is only getting better over time.
20.
by trio8453 3mo ago
The documentation lives alongside the code and is changed at the same time.
21.
by trio8453 3mo ago
I don't understand the people who have the patience to listen to Zitron. It's all one-tone takes with no place for nuance, you kind of know what he's going to say and the fact the mixes genuine criticism with bad faith argume
22.
by trio8453 3mo ago
Started ADHD medication. Night and day difference in day to day wellbeing.
23.
by trio8453 3mo ago
Microdosing has very limited evidence to support it, and even mode widely varying claims for what it supposedly helps with.
24.
by trio8453 3mo ago
The Johns Hopkins studies have been administering high doses for 20+ years now. The difference is that they use synthesized psilocybin instead of mushrooms (which makes the dosing more consistent since potency can vary a lot across strains
25.
by trio8453 3mo ago
Not quite a "successful treatment": > This case documents transient multidomain functional improvement in advanced Alzheimer’s disease following psilocybin administration. The findings do not imply disease reversal but suggest
26.
by trio8453 4mo ago
Do they look back on those years fondly?
27.
by trio8453 4mo ago
Which is very short sighted. You or anyone close to you might not be replaced but it should be clear that you don't want to live in a society with 20% unemployment.
28.
by trio8453 4mo ago
So true. One of the smartest animals being treated in the worst possible way. You can't even justify it with some nutritional or health argument - there's nothing essential in pork that humans can't get from other sources. It
29.
by trio8453 4mo ago
You should probably adjust how you work and find a workflow that feels ok to you instead of abandoning it completely.
30.
by trio8453 4mo ago
Veterans also make it easier to get wider political support for legalizing the treatment.

More ›