trinsic2

9 ms·

121.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Ok I'm glad you found a satisfactory answer for yourself.
122.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
How am I not engaging with the root of the problem? I just see it differently than you. And thats ok. I dont think the problem is solved by id verification. This is the position I have been arguing all along and Im not seeing how my positio
123.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
that is a good way of looking at it. I wonder though, if power is a bad thing in and of itself. I know that there will always be power. I would rather have people with good intentions have it then the opposite. Not sure how that will happen
124.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
What about the chat conversation from you asking it to write it?
125.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
its been going on for decades... I don't know if there is an answer to this problem
126.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Im happy to have dialog with anyone that wants to protect children under the circumstances I already described. But if these initiatives push forward IDing people to have protection, then Im sorry you are on the wrong side of life and are i
127.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
I can support any effort that puts the responsibility into the hands of the parent without a mechanism that advances identity verification to protect their children. The way it stands now. this issue is being used by people in power to adva
128.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
You do realize that for whatever reason more and more people in government positions are on the path of authoritarian agendas? Its a pretty important topic right now. All of this privacy related stuff is happening in quick succession. I mea
129.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Here is the response from Adam Schiff >Thank you for contacting me regarding the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA). I appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond. >Keeping children safe and holding accountable bad a
130.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
> This letter is coming at a time where many major media outlets are questioning whether to allow the Wayback Machine to continue to preserve journalism. Questioning whether to allow? Hmm. I didn't know media outlets we're judg
131.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
On my Iphone. I removed the music app. and was unable to play music in my car with the usb interface. It had no app to play from. VLC must use the music player in some way to play the audio. This is without carplay btw. Im pretty sure carpl
132.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Thank you for understanding. I know sometimes topics can get out of hand with comments about related things, but I this case. We might be better off looking at all the extremities.
133.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Yeah I have the same senators. Emailed them directly from their website. There should be links right above those messages.
134.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
This is a good point. I tend to be careful not to fall into this trap myself, but it doesn't really do any good to call it out in public. it ends up empowering the bad actors. Thank you for this awareness.
135.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Look, please don't sideline/marginalize people by using the "whataboutism" term. Thats being used more and more to silence dialog from people that see problems outside the focus of a specific area. Its important that we
136.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Speaking of which. Under Cellular Data There is a setting right below Automatic Downloads call "App Downloads". I wonder if that works independently of whether or not Automatic Downloads is off. The only options are: Always allow,
137.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
I use VLC for my music. Did you know if you uninstall the music app you can't play music though another music app?
138.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Maybe this is not the same thing but I had this happen to me with the ticktock app. It installed by itself. The only difference I can see between this situation and my own is I'm positive I never installed this app because I never used
139.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
That's our current understanding right now based on one way of looking at the data. We do not have all the answers or a complete understanding of everything.
140.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
I was transparent in where I was at. You are making statements based on nothing. We are all human, we make mistakes, your the one with the problem if you cant see this.
141.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
> If you're presented with the option to resist and force their hand so you can try to challenge it legally, please do, I respect that idea. But not everyone is willing to make personal sacrifices like that. Of course, everyone shou
142.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
LOL. Oook.. No i dont think so. The human experience and the mechanisms behind it have a lot of unknowns and im pretty sure that trying to confine the human experience into the amount of parameters there are is short sighted.
143.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
I don't need to delete my comments. The stand the way they are. Im comfortable with making mistakes and being wrong. And btw its not a derailment to ask questions related to jurisprudence of this administration's criminal actions.
144.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
> So why can he do this? Because he can. And there's nothing you can do about it. And if you fight back there will be repercussions. LOL. We'll see. You sound like you want this to happen and you dont care about the outcome. Go
145.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Thats a federal institution. Is this institution federal? Edit: thanks for the links. You can tell they are operating without authority. I had been totally unaware of this
146.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
I read your comment and im not seeing it. Show me the evidence of this happening, because this sounds like wild speculation.
147.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Is there any evidence of this happening? Sources.
148.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Who would do that? and by what authority?
149.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
The change starts with us not follow the orders and actions of a criminal.
150.
by trinsic2 6mo ago
Im not quite sure what you are getting at. Its true we are a common law country, but then what? Finish your thought.

More ›