trinitry3

4 ms·

1.
by trinitry3 7y ago
Only if your developers are inexperienced.
2.
by trinitry3 8y ago
Did we just seriously compare coffee to meth?
3.
by trinitry3 8y ago
You can use -P.
4.
by trinitry3 8y ago
Nothing to do with CTEs. The queries were badly written to begin with and should have used LATERAL.
5.
by trinitry3 8y ago
I have a recurring dream where my teeth are glued shut but for whatever reason I have to open my mouth, ripping all my teeth out.
6.
by trinitry3 8y ago
She could just say that to every patient and she'd be right most of the time ;-)
7.
by trinitry3 8y ago
> Why should any government incentivize that? Well maybe they shouldn't, but it's shitty to apply this kind of policy retroactively. (I don't know when they actually announced the fact that you can't deduct losses.)
8.
by trinitry3 8y ago
This is really bad advice: 1) This is not really a temporary table in the traditional sense; you're creating a real table and then dropping it. This has problems with concurrency (you can't have two "real&q
9.
by trinitry3 9y ago
> Relating to wallhacks, they can use your last 1,000 matches, and if you're never/rarely surprised by a camping enemy, you're probably cheating. Your camera position moments before interaction with an obscured enemy is pr
10.
by trinitry3 9y ago
> Say I wanted to present a list of users with their top three to-do items, that's impossible using the above method. Not really: SELECT u.user, i.text FROM users u, LATERAL (SELECT * FROM items WHERE items.user = u.us
11.
by trinitry3 9y ago
There was a patch for fixing #1 with new syntax for the next version on the mailing list, so perhaps in a year this'll get fixed?