trimetric

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by trimetric 12y ago

   I don't think they've screwed up Typekit at all.
2. 2.▲
   by trimetric 14y ago

   An ugly website is one thing, there are millions, but an ugly website that has found an entirely new way to be ugly is impressive.
3. 3.▲
   by trimetric 14y ago

   Ahh, right, i missed that. I was distracted from the sub-headings by the big bold responsive headings.
4. 4.▲
   by trimetric 14y ago

   This is a really impressive effect, but I'd hesitate to use it as part of a generic cms backed site since the auto-sizing could inadvertently editorialize the meaning of a headline at different page widths. "Roddick SURVIVES, Staving Off R
5. 5.▲
   by trimetric 14y ago

   I do not like language {X}, but I do like language {Y}. Everyone should agree to write in language {Y}, so that we can all pretend that language {X} does not exist, and maybe then browsers will just start using {Y} natively.
6. 6.▲
   by trimetric 14y ago

   There are some fairly clear indicators from Adobe itself about the future of dreamweaver. Note what they say in the 'Code' section here: http://html.adobe.com/toolsandservices/ "We think there’s a need for a different type of code editor