Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
trhway
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
811.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
>then the supply chains can be (re-)built similar like with networks the value of supply chain grows with its size, ie. more competing suppliers decrease the prices and increase the productivity and efficiency. It also lowers the risks o
812.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
>the tariffs will encourage the creation of more, better, jobs in the US through re-shoring that isn't possible for any production other than a primitive one. The modern production is very complicated, and in particular contains lon
813.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
My napkin is with Starcloud https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43190778 , ie. one Starship $10M launch - 10 000 GPU datacenter into LEO with energy and cooling. I missed there batteries for the half the time being in the
814.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
Foundation of US economy is domestic consumption. The current administration has significantly increased taxes - in the form of tariffs - on that consumption. So, the results are and are going to be as expected by any economy textbook. Addi
815.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
Not a full answer, just a minor comment. >We're not starting to inhabit new bodies of land for a long time now. Last century has been aviation - start of the expansion into the 3rd dimension - and later - space.
816.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
doesn't scale well. The amount of air entering is proportional to square - cross-section - while the mass of rocket is cubic. While scramjet/turbojet/air-augmentation, say as a separate detachable stage, can be pretty efficie
817.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
That is about my point - i want to get as far as possible from such a philosophy as it is taking over the civilization. I lived under similar philosophy in USSR and, as long as it is up to me, i'll be trying to put a distance in all se
818.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
Bussard would collect gas to be used as fuel. For ion thruster it is only a working mass.
819.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
Yep, and dying on Mars feels to me better than on Earth.
820.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
The technicalities would be worked out. The awfulness isn't a goal here. The acceptance would have me still in Russia :)
821.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
Our civilization has been driven by expansion. Without it we'd probably collapse into a neurally-connected well-organized ant colony without need for further technological/social/economic progress (which would naturally selec
822.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
alternatively you ionize that particle, may be make in into plasma by laser for ease of "digestion" down in the engine, direct in into the engine where it is used as working mass for your ion thruster, kind of similar to scramjet.
823.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
gravitational lensing would make the light go around the black hole.
824.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
So, if 3.67% was enough for them (like for anybody else doing peaceful nuclear energy), why they have produced so much of 60%? Edit: judging by the answers the word "why" happened to be misunderstood in my question. I'll res
825.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
Of course Israel wouldn't be able to it on its own. I think the 3 US aircraft carrier fleets around will do the job.
826.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
That is why my bet is that no-fly zone is coming. It is already de-facto there, and just needs official announcement and commitment of resources.
827.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
even if Iran was honestly complying, it seems that 60% level left them enough wiggle room for "accidental enrichment" Ooopps : https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/2/20/iran-denies-enrichi... &q
828.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
brings up that old paradox - should any line of sight ultimately end up at a star?
829.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
It’s a reserve, so meh… until got activated and deployed to a war zone. That would be fun to watch :) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EIxsPBbZ_b8&pp=ygUWeW91J3JlIGl...
830.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
The JDAM precision is 5m. More than 30 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiriyah_shelter_bombing "At 04:30 on the morning of 13 February, two F-117 stealth bombers each dropped a 910 kilograms (2,000 lb) G
831.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
That limestone probably much better transfers the seismic wave of the explosion though.
832.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
They don't have much options. They have only Revolutionary Guard for them. Army hates the Guard. The Guard isn't really a fighting force, it can only launch missiles and beat unarmed protesters. Once it runs out of missiles (with
833.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
GBU-57 reaches 200ft depth, Fordow is 300ft. The seismic wave of explosion at 200ft of several tons of TNT would reach 300ft with pretty damaging energy. And, if it weren't enough, you can always put a second bomb into the hole made b
834.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
no boots on the ground and more moderate goals. The current state of Iraq - severely corrupt moderately religious not threatening anybody kleptocracy would be a success here. Not threatening is the key - Iran has been behind sectarian viol
835.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
Iran regime has been a great destabilizer and war monger. So, may be their nuke development just provided an opening for the regime change operation. The Middle East will be much more peaceful once Iran is de-fanged. This even may help Euro
836.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
> I guess it's dope, but it seems like cartoon armament to me. The first bunker-buster : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_bomb "According to an anecdote, the idea arose after a group of Royal Navy offi
837.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
I'd think it isn't about employee getting 30%. It is about the companies would be paying money really for nothing in most cases, and thus forcing the companies to avoid blanket enforcement (and unpredictable at that as it avoids t
838.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
how about hanging metal detector from a drone or just plain autonomous RC car. I think once such massive de-mining starts in Ukraine, the tech would trickle down into archaeology and the like fields.
839.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
US GDP 2024 is $29T. Thus 0.8% is $230B.
840.
▲
by
trhway
1y ago
In a prison cell. - what is your sentence? - 25 years - what for? - for nothing. - you're lying. The sentence for nothing is 10 years. It seems Google Translate does pretty good job https://savok-name.t
More ›