tresqotheq

6 ms·

1.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
> Except you can find another group of holy men who disagree with that group. This happens in your "western science" also (despite all the ability to "test" things), he he he...excuse me. Couldn't help it.
2.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
Sure, the common man can belive one thing more than other. Does not mean that their actions are not based on belief in both cases... Aren't you guys truly not getting this simple thing? I should probably get out of this thread..
3.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>Man is imperfect. Yes >The scientific method is a process that verifies... And this process is done by imperfect men...who you end up trusting ...
4.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
It is, because you can verify the claims of a holy man if you go meditate in a cave for a couple of decades. Since no one is willing to do that, people used to accept their word for a fact. The same is the case with science claim that canno
5.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>The fact that things seem to work does not mean that they actually do work. Well, the same can be applied to your "western science" as well..
6.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>Except when we test them, they don’t seem to work after all. Have you heard about the replication crisis in your "western science"?
7.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
They can, but that wouldn't be too interesting to anyone in this universe. Or that it how I read it. Just like a being in a game wondering what caused the game company/programmer to write the game.. The reason will have no consequ
8.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>You fell into the trap of thinking that each person needs to verify each claim in order to put general trust in science. I am not falling into any trap. Science and religion has its legit original purpose (religion was never meant to ex
9.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>what makes you trust your own perception when you verify scientific claims" Because it is with my own perception that I sense the rest of the world with it. So that is all that one should care. Let me know if you don't get thi
10.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
> I can predict which hospital will have better patient outcomes. That is quite besided the point. The point being every patient who goes there believes the hospital us doing western blah blah blah... Let me simplyfy it even more. The
11.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
> The claims of a holy man are not. How come? The claims of holy men are verified by other holy men.
12.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
Moving goalposts much? > which are produced from them actually seem to work. Oh yea, religeious things also seem to work. For example, prayers and other religeous offerings. That is how these things survive so long.
13.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
> who caused the universe is already out of bounds. "caused" can mean a different thing. Imagine causualty in a 3d FPS video game, and the creation of the game itself. Though they are similar in semantics, one is different from
14.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
And if "people" are limited by resources, say if someone need an LHC to verify something..what really is the difference...?
15.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32621532
16.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
Tell me, how many scientific "claims" that you rely on a day to day basis, have you verified personally? Or How many such claims can be verified with a single average person's limited resource?
17.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
> it says contradicts science? contradicting science is no great flaw. "Science" contradicts itself from time to time.
18.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
> did the creator come to be.. Time, and causuality, is a construct inside of our universe. Asking who created the creator is like asking which way is down when you are in outer space..
19.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>Science is not a religion. What is the difference between a holy man who claims to have the word of god, and a scientist who claims to have followed the "scientifc method"? Modern human believes the latter. That is the d
20.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>But they are very very old tools and I don't think we need them anymore. The societial problems that once solved by religion is worse than ever. It is true that current religions cannot solve it, because they have been "fact c
21.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>attention span is short, Fix that first. Because without that, education only serve to create decoys/rubber stamps/plants.
22.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
I am a simple man. When ever I see the words "Toxic Culture" spoken by people somehere, I flee the country..
23.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
> But society is all about balancing the good and the bad. Yes, but the "bad" tends to become "good", as the members of the society becomes weaker and weaker.
24.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
> what are they made of? The same stuff that all the stuff in your dreams are made of...
25.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>We should fight first for a proper legal recourse It does not matter, because we don't have any fight left in us at all..
26.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>The only way for you to stay alive is to hike to lawless desert city of "Kowloon 2.1" And this would be the best thing that ever happened to you.
27.
Delta chat: A messaging app that works over email(delta.chat)
5 points by tresqotheq 4y ago|0 comments
28.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
If you are gonna "what if", please "what if" mosquitoes as well...
29.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
>Serious question, is there anything good about mosquitos? Is there anything good about human beings? Have they done anything that is good for rest of the planet?
30.
by tresqotheq 4y ago
> your air conditioned car.. I would rather drive the car through a beautiful landscape (that I pick), instead in rush hour trafic that I don't have a choice in.. >Then work in an amazing office.. That I did't choose... >

More ›