trasz

78 ms·

841.
by trasz 4y ago
So it’s USA’s fault that Russia became a fascist country and decided to invade?
842.
by trasz 4y ago
Of course it is - but it’s a defensive proxy war. The aggressor is Russia, not NATO.
843.
by trasz 4y ago
„War against Russia” is a rather strange way to describe defense against Russian invasion.
844.
by trasz 4y ago
Your comment is is pure whataboutism. Also: which Chinese efforts? Differently from US and Russia, China hasn’t invaded anyone for quite a few decades.
845.
by trasz 4y ago
Doubtful. I find it hard to believe that a country that’s not even capable of manufacturing ordinary cars can maintain and service nuclear weapons.
846.
by trasz 4y ago
It never ceases to amaze me how Americans claim China has no human rights, but at the same time claim US - the country with worlds highest incarceration ratio, where police can kill random people with impunity, where convicted child rapists
847.
by trasz 4y ago
Not surprising, given how Canada imprisoned Chinese folks on purely political charges. It takes two to cooperate.
848.
by trasz 4y ago
That’s only tangentially similar to Inferno, and completely unlike Plan9. Even for Inferno the idea was to make the system flexible, Android is everything but.
849.
by trasz 4y ago
I’d propose a JDAM. This war would look a whole lot different if Kremlin ceased to exist.
850.
by trasz 4y ago
Now replace “war” with “murder” or “rape”. Are murder and rape “tools to be respected” to you too?
851.
by trasz 4y ago
It’s not really more complicated; it’s just that Capsicum implements an actual security model instead of a random hodgepodge, like with seccmp or pledge, and that means one has to fit the application into that model.
852.
by trasz 4y ago
Again, no - it would only work if every single one FOSS developer agreed to use it.
853.
by trasz 4y ago
So? That doesn’t justify shifting that costs to society. You’re assuming corporations have to be allowed to do whatever they want, because otherwise they would earn less money, and you’re assuming that’s not an acceptable outcome.
854.
by trasz 4y ago
"One side of abortion debate" sounds exactly like "one side of the flat earth debate". There's no debate: there's a fringe view of "life from conception" and there's the opposite view founded on
855.
by trasz 4y ago
I can think of vastly more humiliating things, like a video of a woman spreading antivax or pro-choice propaganda. And, differently from a blowjob, which is just a religiously motivated prejudice, those acts are actually harmful and evil.
856.
by trasz 4y ago
Your business card requires security updates.
857.
by trasz 4y ago
It doesn't - companies can still use FOSS software, just not AGPL. That's pretty much exactly how it works right now.
858.
by trasz 4y ago
Can you quote the part that requires CSAM? As for age - it's already there, you can't serve underage content to minors. As for "truthiness" - I'd say this part makes a lot of sense, given the current pandemic of fa
859.
by trasz 4y ago
>the cost of serving the sheer number of people Google serves That cost is mostly imaginary. First, it’s already tiny - computers are cheap - and second, 90% of that cost is for stuff that only matters to Google; you could make that par
860.
by trasz 4y ago
If you look at the proposal, it clearly says this would only apply to (de facto) broadcasters, not to ordinary people; look at the sentence mentioning OFCOM.
861.
by trasz 4y ago
I’m not entering credit card info though. And even if I did, it’s not very security-sensitive - in the worst case the bank will give me back my money stolen from the card.
862.
by trasz 4y ago
They aren’t in different trust zones, because there’s nothing to trust in either of those. The reason for using different passwords is to minimize the losses when they leak.
863.
by trasz 4y ago
AGPL fixes nothing; the companies will simply base their backends on software that’s not AGPL-encumbered.
864.
by trasz 4y ago
If those allegations were true - and even GCHQ admitted it was bullshit - then those backdoors would be demonstrated, like it was the case with Cisco and Juniper.
865.
by trasz 4y ago
>I think there is potential in the emerging field of community authored software. It’s been emerging for the past 30 years, it’s called Open Source. As opposed to commercial projects releasing a “technically open” source code, like with
866.
by trasz 4y ago
Huawei _holds_ lots of patents there. It was sanctioned because US couldn’t compete on market terms, not because of alleged “IP theft” - which used to be a normal practice for US companies (and government; there are quite a few stories of
867.
by trasz 4y ago
Maybe in US; civilized countries obey Human Rights, not “citizen rights”.
868.
by trasz 4y ago
Ethically the company is not a human, and thus doesn’t have any inherent rights. The only rights it can have are those that were granted to benefit society - or because of corruption/lobbying.
869.
by trasz 4y ago
Questioning pope’s infallibility used to be a pretty big line too, and now we know it was all just bluff; there was never a proper reason not to cross it. To put it differently: the law must keep up with times. The law we have wasn’t desig
870.
by trasz 4y ago
This could be easily fixed by introducing a law forcing companies to give out half of company’s shares to the union. The only reason this doesn’t happen is political - peoples votes don’t matter, what matters is company lobbying.

More ›