Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
trapnii
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
> What’s modal about it? Modal? The various input modes. Think of them as if you're using vi/vim, except that it's a terminal. Insert mode is just like every other terminal. Press Ctrl+Shift+Space to move to normal mode (c
2.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
This is interesting. I am trying not to feel offended by your toxic play, so let's get started: > kitty's graphics protocol is literally infinitely faster than sixels for local transmission Let's get the comparison right h
3.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
This doesn't make sense. WebGL is as GPU accelerated as the other young'ish GPU accelerated terminals, except that they're not running in the browser, which should(tm) make them run faster. On the other hand, rendering is jus
4.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
We finally have a software-fallback, and do not hard-depend on AES-NI anymore. But if it's present, we'll use it (also its equivalent on ARM64)
5.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
Hey, we are using Qt only on the pure frontend GUI side. The rendering itself is using FreeType + HarfBuzz independantly of the GUI. We chose this model explicitly to still be free to replace Qt with something else in the future - iff we ha
6.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
To be honest, refterm was a bad idea to begin with. It's not a terminal, and it eventually also stated that in its README.md. Not to mention, that you - by definition - can't compare apples with pies. refterm is not a terminal and
7.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
simply put, yes. but I know very well that performance can be measured in many different dimensions and ways. I optimize for speed for my own personal use-cases (vim should be fluent as well as notcurses-demo as well as cat'ing large o
8.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
There are even YT videos about that. Not kittyng :)
9.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
How did you install Contour and what is the TERM environment variable set to and is your terminfo properly resolved? I just asked someone with an AMD/NVIDIA card to try out nvtop inside Contour and it worked. So I assume maybe there is
10.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
> In comparaison I have to add that the rendering in more defined in Urxvt that Contour even after tinkering, Nothing is perfect. Many thanks for trying though. If you don't mind, maybe you could file a report in github.com/con
11.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
While I personally find your comment quite insulting, I think that we have pretty brought support for various mainstream Linux distributions and also release binaries, including for MacOS and Windows. For Arch there's even an AUR, and
12.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
> It would be nice if someone worked on actually improving the terminal experience. Contour. Oh, sorry, I mean: To be honest? There are plenty of young terminals that work on that, it's not just Contour, but also WezTerm, foot, Ghos
13.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
There are many reasons for me to not have kitty protocol implemented. Objectively speaking, I try to mention only one here: Sixel seems to have raised attraction across the whole terminal community over the past years and gets stronger adop
14.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
Please give us feedback in the issue tracker. We know we're not perfect, but certainly very much appreciate positive constructive feedback as well as bug reports. p.s.: I did not submit this link here, I intentionally try to avoid that
15.
▲
by
trapnii
3y ago
To be fair, the vi input mode (or modal input modes) in Contour are way more than simply doing `set -o vi` in bash. You cannot compare those two. The reason why I implemented modal input modes (vi mode) in Contour is, that I noticed Tilix [
16.
▲
Monomux, The
(github.com)
2 points
by
trapnii
4y ago
|
1 comments
17.
▲
by
trapnii
4y ago
Monomux is a terminal multiplexer that isn't a terminal emulator. Less featureful than tmux (therefore) but still the better screen. Read the "Why" section for a much better explanation. :)
18.
▲
by
trapnii
4y ago
Exactly. Therefore you cannot compare a renderers performance with some other that has a fully functional VT backend attached. The comparising result is meaningless. His renderer is good, but the VT throughput performance claims he makes ar
19.
▲
by
trapnii
4y ago
> > I am open for being corrected > No. No you're not. Because you keep shifting goalposts and ignoring inconvenient truths. I still am. Please submit a PR to refterm to that implements the VT sequences I mentioned above, unti
20.
▲
by
trapnii
4y ago
I don't your name, pc86, is a real name, too. That's the life of them internet. So much about Pseudonym. So if already the very first statement is that questionable, how can I believe the rest you write had any truth?
21.
▲
by
trapnii
4y ago
> And yes it is simple. I like. Please submit a PR and make Windows Terminal as fast as refterm, trivially speaking, 2GB/s, no slower than the unoptimized refterm. Just to quote you: simple. :-D
22.
▲
by
trapnii
4y ago
Reading your post feels good, man. But your last sentence kind of bothers me. Why do you feel they are insulting you now? I think, if at all, someone else was, and kept doing, and still is, insulting them instead. I'm just trying to un
23.
▲
by
trapnii
4y ago
the part where "he" is wrong, is the part where he tells everyone that his reference software can be compared to a real terminal. You cannot compare shoes with towels, nor cats with a TV. The tiling renderer "he" wrote a
24.
▲
by
trapnii
5y ago
Hey; what do you mean by "force"? I mean, to me this reads like you don't want to see italic nor bold font in the terminal (due to lag of monospace support in that regard maybe). But I think having the possibility of italic,
25.
▲
by
trapnii
12y ago
this whole website rather sounds like a blackmail. I'm not a big fan of systemd (anymore) either. but forking is not a solution to the init-system problem et al.
26.
▲
by
trapnii
13y ago
800 lines of assembler code basically means just 800 assembler (CPU) instructions - for a complete FAT32 filesystem driver? I really hardly doubt that unless seen. :-) Any way to opensource that or anything else to comment on your shockin
27.
▲
by
trapnii
13y ago
it is more about the attitude of a C programmer versus the attitude of a, say, JavaScript or Ruby programmer. Whilest the latter merely assumes "nah, the VM will catch all null pointers as soft exceptions for me, and all exceptions I d
28.
▲
by
trapnii
13y ago
his point probably: because Obama exactly knows what she's doing. ;)