touleier

4 ms·

1.
by touleier 10y ago
Yes, you are therefore a member of a well-defined breeding population (deme) and that membership gives us useful information immediately. Not only do you have a greater chance of getting certain diseases, your group also has higher intellig
2.
by touleier 10y ago
Oh dear. We are constantly subjected to this sort of scolding in the name of some political ideology (in this case, 'wimmin'). Diamonds are exactly about signaling, as is an Ivy League education. Attributing useful properties to
3.
by touleier 10y ago
If you don't know the details, that is easily remedied by reading the CBS Report, which I linked to. It is free. I followed this controversy at the time, and it is very revealing precisely in those details, which I read in full as so
4.
by touleier 10y ago
"suggests ignorance" == ad hominem. Rather is a discredited hack. Get a clue.
5.
by touleier 10y ago
Science is a "social construct". As is anything else we talk about. Try telling someone with sickle-cell anemia that race is just a social construct.
6.
by touleier 10y ago
By the same token, there are hordes of Americans who affect a belief that there are no races, and think any attempt to apply Darwinism to human nature is the quintessence of evil. Liberal Creationists.
7.
by touleier 10y ago
Taking Dan Rather's advice on a responsible attitude to science is like going to Bill Cosby for dating advice, or asking Rolf Harris to run your kindergarten. Booted from CBS in disgrace for confusing journalism with character assassi