torthrowaway998

5 ms·

1.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
>Pedophilia is child sexual abuse Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to children to be more specific, it is not child sexual abuse.
2.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
I am aware of it. r3856283 and RMS weren't. Is this that bad?
3.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
>the "emacs virgin" thing He stopped doing it once people told him that it made others uncomfortable. >being a creep ('tender embraces') In the business cards that he gave out to people of any gender. This is not r
4.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
>It kind of misses the point it was never just about Minsky and Epstein. This was how it started and this was also what most news reported on so I do not believe that it misses the point. >Did anyone explain him that he downplayed the
5.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
I presume that he knew that she contributed to the glibc manual but not to the GCC. Why not ask him?
6.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
I do not see how this changes anything.
7.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
This appendix is pretty much filled with lies and misrepresentations of his statements. Please avoid spreading it. It is pretty much "fake news". >"RMS has spent years on a campaign against using people’s correct pronouns.
8.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
Stallman has informed opinions on these topics however. He is not some Q nutjob. As for me, as long as they were being tolerant of others and did not withdraw from public dialogue then sure, I would not mind working with him. >>That&#
9.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
I don't believe that I have ever seen RMS using this argument regarding GPL.
10.
by torthrowaway998 5y ago
>including wanting to blacklist anyone who contributed to the extension I think you refer to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26722528 , if so it is more about giving them the same treatment that they give others. If
11.
by torthrowaway998 6y ago
>Lots of people on the spectrum know how to behave. It is called a spectrum because it contains a lot of different conditions that vary significantly. >but he doesn't have to be in the decision board of the FSF to do this Please
12.
by torthrowaway998 6y ago
>He does not have any right to a particular job No offense but I find this argument to be in bad faith. You would not say that for someone being fired due to being lgbt, would you? (whether it is legal or not is irrelevant here as this i
13.
by torthrowaway998 6y ago
>if your views hurt a significant amount of people Stallman's views hurt people in the sense that some people got offended that he believed in things that they did not. None of his views could hurt people in any other way, he never
14.
by torthrowaway998 6y ago
This is the article that started the whole "RMS defended epstein" lie. It contained a lot of other lies that the author has refused to fix. Considering all that I would say that it is not trustworthy. Even if it is true there is a
15.
by torthrowaway998 6y ago
There was another article about stallman 2 hours ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26707498 Direct link: https://stallmansupport.org/ (it debunks various attacks against him) 2nd throwaway because t