tornato7

16 ms·

151.
by tornato7 3y ago
It's a bad question. 1. This question just exploits GPT-4's inability to count accurately, which is some combination of how the attention mechanism and tokenization works. But counting isn't reasoning. If you go around the co
152.
by tornato7 3y ago
There is a huge difference between being correct 50% of the time (like a coin flip) and correct 51% of the time. Because in the second case, you can run the model 10,000 times and the median response will be the correct one at least 97% of
153.
by tornato7 3y ago
Every paper and comment I've seen that claims "GPT-4 can't reason" is either an example of bad prompting, bad/vague english, or taking advantage of the limitations of tokenization (like asking GPT-4 how many letters
154.
by tornato7 3y ago
Yes, but in theory if suspicious behavior was detected those devices could be permanently blacklisted from a website, making the investment challenging. If WEI goes through we'll probably see cheap PCs popping up on eBay that are unabl
155.
by tornato7 3y ago
EDIT: I see it's a WordPress site and I take back what I said. WordPress is a nightmare to maintain.
156.
by tornato7 3y ago
If Google had an opt-in way for authors to get their book indexed that would be fantastic. But the settlement required authors to opt out, and Google made that difficult to do.
157.
by tornato7 3y ago
Google Books had 'previews' of books that included large swaths of the content. They claimed to only publish this with the author's permission but as I understand it the way that permission was granted was quite sneaky and au
158.
by tornato7 3y ago
Just some of the problems authors already faced online (I'm related to one): - Google indexing and republishing all of their work for free on Google Books (finally resolved after a huge Class Action suit where the authors were awarded
159.
by tornato7 3y ago
If you "Look Inside" the offending books on Amazon you can see they have extensive "About the Author" page describing Jane Friedman - so it would be difficult to argue that the books are not trying to trick people into b
160.
by tornato7 3y ago
So you're suggesting that publishing a hash in a newspaper every day is a better solution than a digital ledger? This is peak buttcoiner logic. That actually used to be done [1], because Blockchain are valuable, but not anymore because
161.
by tornato7 3y ago
Last time I did a 24-hour all-nighter hackathon I wrote about 3K lines of code, but I would not recommend doing that daily.
162.
by tornato7 3y ago
You can change it on their free self-hosted deployment.
163.
by tornato7 3y ago
I set up Jitsi on my home server yesterday using their Docker guide [1]. It took about an hour to get it working and another hour to configure it to my liking. I was able to tweak the settings to allow 4K audio/video quality that blows
164.
by tornato7 3y ago
Correct - you can interact with it from any Ethereum wallet, and mint/redeem it within the PayPal app.
165.
by tornato7 3y ago
This is a setting that you change on the host that applies to all clients using that Jitsi server.
166.
by tornato7 3y ago
Yes, you can change the maxFullResolutionParticipants setting in config.js to fix this.
167.
by tornato7 3y ago
The free version of Jitsi does, yes. I'm self-hosting my own Jitsi instance and was able to configure the quality settings way beyond anything you can get from Zoom or Google Meet. I can have ten people with 30Mbps 4K video streams on
168.
by tornato7 3y ago
Just have them wear clothes made with ferromagnetic material, should have a similar effect.
169.
by tornato7 3y ago
The only reason human communication is ineffective is because it's slow. If an AI can read/write 1000s of words per second there's no reason it shouldn't use natural language to communicate.
170.
by tornato7 3y ago
Trees are obviously better, but if nothing else we could probably achieve a huge cooling effect by just stretching sun shades across our 'urban canyons'
171.
by tornato7 3y ago
In 100 years people will be pondering what it would be like to live between 2003 and 2043 :) Uh oh, did I just jinx 2043?
172.
by tornato7 3y ago
The attacker basically calls Transfer(From your address, to phishing address, quantity 0) They can't actually transfer any crypto because your approval for that token is zero. But they can technically transfer zero tokens from your ad
173.
by tornato7 3y ago
How this scam works: - User sends crypto to some address, say 0x1234...abcd - An attacker identifies a pattern of the user sending crypto to that address - Attacker brute-forces a similar looking wallet address, say 0x1235...bbcd - this is
174.
Someone sent $20M to one of the address poisoning / 0-value transfer spams(twitter.com)
3 points by tornato7 3y ago|6 comments
175.
by tornato7 3y ago
Original Tweet: wowwwwwwwww 10hrs ago someone sent $20m to one of the address poisoning / 0-value transfer spams bad addy 0xa7bf48749d2e4aa29e3209879956b9baa9e90570 real addy 0xa7b4bac8f0f9692e56750aefb5f6cb5516e90570 https:/&#x2
176.
by tornato7 3y ago
You can sell $150M worth of ETH right now on-chain without moving the price much. If you aggregate the other chains and exchanges it's probably close to $1b in an instant sell, of course if you TWAP you'll get much better executio
177.
by tornato7 3y ago
That's for Base64-encoded GZIP, not GZIP-encoded Base64 :)
178.
by tornato7 3y ago
Sure, regulate them as securities, but the problem is the SEC has made it nearly impossible to actually register a cryptocurrency as a security. https://policy.paradigm.xyz/writing/secs-path-to-registratio...
179.
by tornato7 3y ago
It's not ideal, but in practice GZIP base64 is only marginally larger than GZIP binary
180.
by tornato7 3y ago
Especially today with Copilot and GPT-4, if I need to merge two sorted lists with optimal time complexity, I'll just ask GPT-4 and it'll give me the leetcode-optimal solution adapted to my language and variable names. Leetcode is

More ›