tony_ch

5 ms·

1.
by tony_ch 2y ago
If the censoring miners or ”validators” both have the majority and refuse to build on top of blocks that happen to include the transactions they don’t like, such transactions would be completely blocked from the blockchain. Thus, censorship
2.
by tony_ch 2y ago
Currently, there are about 50% of Post-Merge OFAC Compliant Blocks on Ethereum, which means there’s a half of the whole network that doesn’t want to deal with Tornado Cash transactions. For now, they only block such transactions from their
3.
Tornado Cash Is One Step Away from Full Censorship (and a Solution)(hackernoon.com)
3 points by tony_ch 2y ago|1 comments
4.
by tony_ch 3y ago
Quote: "Essentially, it would create an inverse pyramid whereby the holders of the native token could control the transactions of the said stablecoin."
5.
by tony_ch 4y ago
Miners and validators in blockchains can censor individual transactions and extract MEV. Order providers in DAG can only sabotage the entire network, even if all they want is censoring a single transaction.
6.
Blockchain vs. DAG: Ideological Battle in DLT Platforms(fintechly.com)
2 points by tony_ch 4y ago|0 comments
7.
by tony_ch 4y ago
With the long dependency trees of modern open-source projects, cascading donations help fund the lower-level projects such as libraries.
8.
by tony_ch 4y ago
Both are just tools but blockchain is better suited for the tasks where the community/collective's interests should be prioritized over those of the individual, while DAG is a better fit for the tasks where individual freedoms ar
9.
by tony_ch 4y ago
Both DAG and blockchain are much older than cryptocurrencies.
10.
Kivach presents an open donations platform designed for open-source developers(getnews.info)
2 points by tony_ch 4y ago|1 comments
11.
by tony_ch 4y ago
Two main things that make it stand out: - cascading donations: one can set up one's repo to automatically forward a percentage of donations to other repos, such as dependencies, thus sharing the donations with them. This is very releva
12.
DAG vs. Blockchain as Individualism vs. Collectivism(blog.obyte.org)
2 points by tony_ch 4y ago|1 comments
13.
by tony_ch 4y ago
The differences between DAG and blockchain are really fundamental.
14.
by tony_ch 4y ago
Perhaps you are referring to some other distribution. Distribution of one of the tokens and distribution of power are unrelated in Obyte. The article is a bit more general and its conclusions would equally apply to a hypothetical DAG-based
15.
Distribution of power in DAGs and blockchains(blog.obyte.org)
1 points by tony_ch 4y ago|3 comments
16.
by tony_ch 4y ago
Summary: in blockchains, the power is concentrated in a few centers, while in DAGs it is more evenly distributed among users. That's because blockchain users only create transactions but have to rely on block producers to add them to t