tomneo

4 ms·

1.
by tomneo 17y ago
both the link i posted and and the link you posted open for me. the title was frack Godel where frack was spelled with multiplication operator. didnt know HN had blasphemy laws !
2.
by tomneo 17y ago
yes. i meant that. the link opens for me. either wat u said is true or my opera has acquired intelligence or quantum mechanics is causing a havoc.
3.
Tarski's undefinability theorem(en.wikipedia.org)
4 points by tomneo 17y ago|5 comments
4.
by tomneo 17y ago
> "first-class functions require references in Perl 5" yes thats what i meant. to put it simply. perl4 did not have lexical variables, first class functions, proper syntax for nested data structures. larry said let there be references.
5.
by tomneo 17y ago
my mistake ... what i meant to say was lexical variables, lexical closures also needed the concept of references.
6.
by tomneo 17y ago
you underestimate ur memory mate :P and yegge is wrong. "references" were added to perl because of lexical variables.
7.
by tomneo 17y ago
a note ruby's syntax philosophy is a bit on the lisp side. python's syntax philosophy is pragmatic. perl's syntax philosophy is on the linguistic side. thats is why its "bare syntax" like sigils and all are wierd like the case endings in en
8.
Readable Perl (compared to lang*)(greenokapi.net)
22 points by tomneo 17y ago|25 comments
9.
Scientific Calculator Hacking Tips (nayuki.eigenstate.org)
1 points by tomneo 17y ago|0 comments
10.
by tomneo 17y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX requires editing then, both,linux and Freebsd are listed in the incomplete side. http://developer.apple.com/leopard/overview/osfoundations.ht... seems to say the same damn lie !