Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tomchristie
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
> Your pathetic argument. You should be ashamed of yourself I'm not giving a free pass simply because it's open source. Rather it's an informed decision that I'm able to make because they're completely transpare
32.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
> He might be a nice target if you want to raise a stink and litigate. * That Phone in your pocket? "No problem" * The browser you're using right now? "This is fine" * Your internet-enabled TV? "All good&quo
33.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
I think it fits well if you expect most projects to be a single engineer working full-time. An equivalent of up to €60k/yr full-time is a pretty good salary by most folks standards, even if it's not quite up there with top-tier en
34.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
Sure. I think a slightly wider remit would be perfectly reasonable too. It's just that kind of funding is a little more complicated to justify, as the outcomes are less well-defined. I'm sure there'll be existing projects wil
35.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
I think that's a rather negative outlook. Is the fund applicable to financing ongoing triage for projects? Nope. Is €30k worth of funding for 40 kicking off individual projects valuable and worthwhile? Hell, yes. Might the scope of an
36.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
Then don't sweat it! :)
37.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
Closest things I know of are: * Ruby Together - https://rubytogether.org/ * Django Fellowship Program - https://www.djangoproject.com/fundraising/ * Read the Docs sponsorships - http://read-
38.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
That's not currently supported. We need recurring revenue rather than one-offs, so that's what I'm pushing for right now. Out of interest, is recurring something you'd consider if there was another lower-priced individua
39.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
As the author, yes. The team I was previously with used Core API in some of https://www.crunchboards.com/ That's got a service-based architecture, and we were using it both on the server side (where we wrote explicit C
40.
▲
Django REST framework 3.4 Released
(django-rest-framework.org)
278 points
by
tomchristie
10y ago
|
87 comments
41.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
I think it's neat demonstration. They've got a simple point to get across, and this is a decent enough way to make it.
42.
▲
Please help fund Django REST Framework development
(djangoproject.com)
1 points
by
tomchristie
10y ago
|
0 comments
43.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
My thoughts on this: * Let's stop talking about 'Donations' and start talking about 'Investment' - the conversation needs to be about the pay-off that businesses will get, not some altruistic "give-back" *
44.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
> useful methods such as ajax() (no, in vanilla js it's not "solved") Right - I use jQuery because I've greater confidence that `.ajax()` will behave correctly across a wide range of browser versions, though I don
45.
▲
Funding Django REST framework
(fund.django-rest-framework.org)
8 points
by
tomchristie
10y ago
|
0 comments
46.
▲
by
tomchristie
10y ago
* Immediate dismissal - the language isn't in any kind of gray zone - completely inappropriate. This person will damage your company if you keep them on. * Make sure they're not able to make a scene. No access to email or the prem
47.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
Fair question. I can only speak from my own experience here: Productivity, productivity, productivity. Yes, there are faster, safer, and more modern languages out there. However Python for me still hits nails the hell out of getting stuff d
48.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
> Is it better? Absolutely, yes. I found it a little "bouncy" on first pass. It felt like there was an edge-of-perceptible lag when updating the display in response to keypresses. I tried switching to it again recently, and tha
49.
▲
Browsable Web APIs for Node.js / Express
(github.com)
3 points
by
tomchristie
11y ago
|
0 comments
50.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
"For the first time ever we have something we need to protect" Humanity has always been worth protecting.
51.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
Anything you can share? Some good examples of networking code with async/await would be incredibly helpful. The documentation covers the primatives but I have a hard time putting it all together.
52.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
> It's ideologically motivated just like the GPL and does a poor job at letting anyone use their code. Agree that it isn't a good choice if what you want is the most permissive, inclusive license. (Completely with you there, an
53.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
> Please, please, please, do not use the WTFPL I think it's a valid, personal choice. If someone wants to make the point that they think licensing legalese sucks, and wants to license their work accordingly, then fair enough. It
54.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
Link is " Needing an IDE should be a code smell". Nothing controversial there.
55.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
Indeed. But you can't guard against catastrophic system failures (out of memory, disk, processor time, corruptions) in the way you can with independant services.
56.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
When I say 'architectural' there I mean that as in the underlying design. How the system is modeled and and what different objects and interfaces exist in that model. Eg. Say you have a billing component in your system. You may ha
57.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
> The module will still affect everything that is dependent upon it if it is rebuilt as a microservice. Your services are running on different servers (or containers) to each other, so they're partitioned. If one service has a bug t
58.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
The benefits of microservices aren't architectural. The point re. library APIs vs services APIs is completely correct, because that's actually not what the microservice style addresses. The point is rather organizational/op
59.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
I understand we can speculate that volatility could increase due to lower trading volumes, but the lower volumes aren't the only factor to take into account in this scenario.
60.
▲
by
tomchristie
11y ago
Does anyone know if regulations on minimum terms for holding period for stock ever been used/considered in modern markets? (eg. day/week/month?) I realize that it'd effect liquidity in a similar way to transactional taxe
More ›