toldnotmywrath

4 ms·

1.
by toldnotmywrath 4mo ago
My understanding is that early (and most extant) visual language models have a component module (called the image encoder) that transforms images into representations (called embeddings) the model's inner layers can process. This is of
2.
by toldnotmywrath 7mo ago
I think the reasoning is that if you don't make an adventure like this painful, the US will not think twice about returning again.
3.
by toldnotmywrath 7mo ago
I know little about law but can we use the word 'attack' for this given that these people pay for these model outputs. Is the output not my property? Does Google have rights to any code Gemini gives me? Are these AI companies tryi
4.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
I frankly hope so.
5.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
I don't know if this happens to anyone else but on reading LLM-generated text I did not prompt, my eyes do incredibly quick saccades from start to middle to end in always around <1-2s no matter the length of the text. It's enti
6.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
Man, I don't think I could lack enough shame to write something like this. Much of the post is spent trying to exculpate himself from any responsibility for the agent's behavior. The apology at the end is a "sorry if you felt
7.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
Problem with much of this talk is receipts are always nowhere to be found.
8.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
> One person companies will not have a 100 person marketing team to inject ads into every corner of your life. But they could have a thousand-agent swarm connected via MCP to everything within our field of vision to bury us with ads. It&
9.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
No, you cannot ignore every argument by claiming someone else made it before. Make an actual response. What new opportunities does the LLM create for the workers it may displace? What new opportunities did neural machine translation create
10.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
There are no premium paid jobs for prompting in a brave new world.
11.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
The problem with this "creative destruction" hand-wave is: - there's no thought given to what happens in the interim. Forget the welfare of those displaced, consider what acts the desperation will lead them to. - these replac
12.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
The firm simply assumes that if the top X was sufficient in the past, it is still sufficient now. From the perspective of modern management, there's really no reason to keep people if you can automate them away.
13.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
You can increase profits by cutting costs. It is remarkably easier to do in the short term. And even if you choose not to downsize you can drop/stagnate wages to gain from the fact everyone else is downsizing.
14.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
Can I take a guess that you believe you will speciate into the former?
15.
by toldnotmywrath 8mo ago
The frame is not from our view. It is from that of this singular chicken who has only ever known its keeper's care. As that chicken, we simply do not know if Christmas will ever come. The collapse of civilizations has happened many tim