togelius

9 ms·

31.
How Darwin plays StarCraft(togelius.blogspot.com)
3 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
32.
Time to rethink AI – or rather, time to rethink design(venturebeat.com)
1 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
33.
When will AI beat humans in different games?(businessinsider.com)
1 points by togelius 10y ago|1 comments
34.
Why games were designed to not need AI(venturebeat.com)
1 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
35.
Has a Black Mirror episode predicted the future of video games?(theguardian.com)
4 points by togelius 10y ago|2 comments
36.
by togelius 10y ago
And general video game playing :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_video_game_playing
37.
by togelius 10y ago
Meta-heuristics as conceptualized by many (most?) does not include selection among algorithms. Hyper-heuristics does. It's fine if some of the algorithms selected among are meta-heuristics. Yes, this is very confusing, and yes, better
38.
by togelius 10y ago
Glad you liked it! We have done some work on trying to generate complete games - an overview of it can be found in this book chapter: http://pcgbook.com/wp-content/uploads/chapter06.pdf The most similar to what yo
39.
by togelius 10y ago
Thanks! And wish I could do something about the blogspot UX.
40.
by togelius 10y ago
Thanks, appreciated! The difference between meta-heuristics and hyper-heuristics is that the former is a much broader concept, including such things as genetic algorithms. Hyper-heuristics is specifically about selecting among heuristics, w
41.
by togelius 10y ago
The source of data is a lot of simulations we ran ourselves. All of the games can be won or lost - there's also a score measure as well, but that was not used in producing that graphic.
42.
by togelius 10y ago
Oops, thanks for spotting the broken paper link - fixed now!
43.
Algorithms that select which algorithm should play which game(togelius.blogspot.com)
63 points by togelius 10y ago|22 comments
44.
Algorithms that select which algorithm should play which game(togelius.blogspot.com)
1 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
45.
Which games are useful for testing artificial general intelligence?(togelius.blogspot.com)
1 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
46.
A comparison of game-based benchmarks for artificial intelligence(togelius.blogspot.com)
1 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
47.
Which games are useful for testing artificial general intelligence?(togelius.blogspot.com)
1 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
48.
Is actual artificial intelligence the next frontier for AI in games?(mobiusai.com)
1 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
49.
Can you build a level generator not for just one game, but for any?(togelius.blogspot.com)
2 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
50.
Human intelligence is overrated (2012)(togelius.blogspot.com)
59 points by togelius 10y ago|91 comments
51.
The differences between tinkering and research(togelius.blogspot.com)
6 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
52.
Teaching computers to be more creative than humans(engineering.nyu.edu)
6 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
53.
Why academics and game industry don't collaborate on AI in games(togelius.blogspot.com)
3 points by togelius 10y ago|0 comments
54.
Creating Powerful AI for Arcade Games with Monte Carlo Tree Search(togelius.blogspot.com)
5 points by togelius 11y ago|0 comments
55.
by togelius 11y ago
Correct - we are not using MCTS and the approach has nothing to do with AlphaGo.
56.
by togelius 11y ago
The fitness function is pretty simple, essentially a weighted piece counter. It's true that it does not look ahead and take future states into account so might fall into a trap, but empirically it's doing very well!
57.
Some rules for the modern scientist(togelius.blogspot.com)
2 points by togelius 11y ago|0 comments
58.
How not to review a paper(togelius.blogspot.com)
2 points by togelius 11y ago|0 comments
59.
This lecture explains how to use AI in games and games for AI(vimeo.com)
2 points by togelius 11y ago|0 comments
60.
What if videogames had actual AI?(togelius.blogspot.com)
3 points by togelius 11y ago|0 comments

More ›