tmpnam7280557

6 ms·

1.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
Note that Cruise Automation did not contribute in any meaningful way to GM Super Cruise. GM's engineers are shipping a real product. At Cruise Automation we're writing software that is so thoroughly unreliable and wrongly designed
2.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
No, look at the PR!
3.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
Both questions: I don't know. But as an individual: I'm vesting while I work to satisfy the conditions for a GM payout.
4.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
Here is the deleted post from below, repeated verbatim. I'll put it here so it doesn't get lost. QUOTE: "Cruise employee here. throwaway for obvious reasons. It needs to be said that this is entirely marketing smoke and mirro
5.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
Yes, I am commenting anonymously. It's necessary. Cruise Automation can produce a good demo. Shortcuts have been taken to produce good-looking results. Don't be deceived. No car running the current software (or any software derive
6.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
An easy question to answer. But I need to be careful about disclosing details in a public forum. System is fundamentally unsuitable for automotive or other timing-critical applications. Engineered wrong from the beginning. It's a dead
7.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
How can I prove this to you without potentially harming myself?
8.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
OP made accurate statements and expressed a sentiment that's typical at Cruise. Your "alternate opinion" is not widely shared.
9.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
This is accurate.
10.
by tmpnam7280557 9y ago
I can confirm that Cruise Automation's software is simply not viable as the basis of a self-driving car.