tjoff

35 ms·

541.
by tjoff 3y ago
Of course it will manage 15 access points, there is nothing to it.
542.
by tjoff 3y ago
Those are different sites, you wouldn't have 8 routers in one place. So I guess each one of those devices can manage 5 unifi devices, going only by the image it looks like in their setup there is one AP for each device (if that is how
543.
by tjoff 3y ago
> UniFi Express supports up to 5 connected UniFi Network devices, including other UniFi Express units, switches, and WiFi access points. What does that even mean? That it bundles a controller that is not "capable" of handling
544.
by tjoff 3y ago
I did mention vendor lock in?
545.
by tjoff 3y ago
> However, the new storage class does open up an exciting new opportunity for all modern data infrastructure: the ability to tune an individual workload for low latency and higher cost or higher latency and lower cost with the exact sam
546.
by tjoff 3y ago
We do, but it requires a lot more for something like this to pass and take people by surprise. In jellyfin there is no central server and it works fine without internet access. With Plex it was always implied that they could do something li
547.
by tjoff 3y ago
Web interface works perfectly fine on mobile? To the point where I haven't bothered to see if there is a native app. Kodi plugin works great too and easy enough with LibreElec or similar. Not sure what "anything else" could b
548.
by tjoff 3y ago
Giving up freedom for convenience often involves some form trust, which isn't unreasonable. You expect a service, you often pay for, to respect their users and to act in their users best interest - even if they have other interests as
549.
by tjoff 3y ago
... try to look at it from a lens other than your own.
550.
by tjoff 3y ago
The weird part is the hype around it, because that extends well beyond that particular scenario. Or maybe scale doesn't matter. Even if you replace thousands with tens you still often have a huge variety in skillset and focus.
551.
by tjoff 3y ago
Sloppy security in favor of reimbursement is financing organized crime. Though how credit card processing fees relate to sloppy security is mostly a brainfart by me.
552.
by tjoff 3y ago
Such fees just encourages bad incentives. Such as terrible security because reimbursing people / financing organized crime is cheaper (cheaper for the bank, of course much more expensive for society).
553.
by tjoff 3y ago
I'm not saying to ditch the laptop, just do the processing on a machine made for it. And of course use the desktop as your main device when you are at your home/office wherever the desktop is.
554.
by tjoff 3y ago
Does people really process uncompressed videos on their laptops?
555.
by tjoff 3y ago
If you are buying a new laptop every generation just for it to be bearable just buy a proper machine that can encode it for you. Bonus points for being able to do it while your laptop is in your bag.
556.
by tjoff 3y ago
Work on a laptop if you must. But don't encode/render etc. on a laptop.
557.
by tjoff 3y ago
And why on earth would you do that on a laptop to start with? I'm sure apple not having decent desktops for a decade leaves a mark. I guess I'm surprised people put up with it.
558.
by tjoff 3y ago
Emu-Edit is the closest I've seen. https://emu-edit.metademolab.com/ https://ai.meta.com/blog/emu-text-to-video-generation-image-...
559.
by tjoff 3y ago
Hah, that reminds me of Spotify. If you had shuffle on and it happened to play the last song it would stop playing, because it was the last song in the playlist ...
560.
by tjoff 3y ago
But that 20% that makes all the difference will only make a difference when the phone is new. Otherwise the opposite is true. Refraining to charge fully makes all the difference and saves you from a tough spot. Which in turn is why (was a b
561.
by tjoff 3y ago
You are right but I disagree. Yes, devices do not charge batteries to 100% as that is directly damaging. And they don't discharge to 0% for the same reason. So they charge to something slightly less. But that slightly less is for all i
562.
by tjoff 3y ago
No? I'm tired and it was way too long since I dealed with Big O so someone will surely correct me. Your computer being finite is irrelevant. Big O is about growth factor. Just because you are capped at value X (< infinity) does not
563.
by tjoff 3y ago
I'm intrigued, any recommendations?
564.
by tjoff 3y ago
That is a weak argument that could be used to justify tons of behavior, very convenient. Vote with your feet. Maybe you can't or can't afford it, then at least admit the problem to yourself and maybe don't try to persuade oth
565.
by tjoff 3y ago
Apple and google has your wifi password, guess microsoft felt left out.
566.
by tjoff 3y ago
Assume you can just connect them to another hub? Doesn't excuse philips but that was at least the only reason I'd consider using them.
567.
by tjoff 3y ago
Most of the time that is actually much better than fractional scaling. On a laptop you are severely constrained by the screen real estate, so minimizing the size of the clutter and focus on the content (text) is a great tradeoff in most cir
568.
by tjoff 3y ago
Which can't be bought by individuals. And even then, buy the same OS again so that it can run on the same hardware? And although I personally am a fan of LTSC it isn't what your typical user would expect. Besides, the problem isn&
569.
by tjoff 3y ago
How is Windows 10 iot relevant? And no, in many cases you can't install windows 11. You won't find the problem if you don't want to.
570.
by tjoff 3y ago
Pollution must be taxed as well, and electric vehicles will have an advantage there. No need to unnecessarily dictate technology. We want light cars and we don't want pollution.

More ›