Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
titojankowski
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Agree with your logic regarding avoiding additional emissions. The extra piece that this RFS add is, we've got about a trillion tons of extra carbon already up in the atmosphere, how do we mine it?
62.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Woohoo, congrats Gustaf! Index of startups and technologies for mining carbon from the air: http://airminers.org We built Air Miners to catalog what exists so hackers can find the gaps in carbon removal and build new solutions :
63.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
YCombinator just posted a new RFS for "Carbon Removal Technologies" ( https://www.ycombinator.com/rfs/#carbon ). We built Air Miners to catalog what exists so you can find the gaps in carbon removal and build n
64.
▲
Show HN: Air Miners – Index of Startups Mining Carbon Dioxide from the Air
(airminers.org)
9 points
by
titojankowski
9y ago
|
5 comments
65.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Thank you for your work! Any thoughts on emoji that indicate the following sentiments: 1. air miners ( http://airminers.org ) 2. the changing climate will create the first trillionaire 3. climate change is the biggest financial op
66.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
oh this is sweet! Come join our Gitter chat: https://gitter.im/giving-a-fuck-about-climate-change/Lobby We made this: http://carbondoomsday.com (background blog post: http://titojankowski.com
67.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Thanks for all the feedback everybody! Luke plugged in all your thoughts into issues on GitHub so we can keep track: https://github.com/giving-a-fuck-about-climate-change/carbon...
68.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Good perspective! Doomsday levels in the works. Relevant article: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/uhenergy/2...
69.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
noted, thanks!
70.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
We chose "carbondoomsday" to be provocative, and to push into a silly level of seriousness about climate change. Similar to http://blog.ycombinator.com/why-toys/
71.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Yes!! What do you think of that answer? Does it spark any new questions?
72.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Well said!
73.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Iron fertilization a great example to spark thinking about low cost / high benefit solutions. That's why we created AirMiners ( http://airminers.org ) to track all the people mining carbon from the air. There's a lo
74.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Also this: http://blog.ycombinator.com/why-toys/ Climate change needs more toys
75.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
8,000 POUNDS OF CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVED PROOF: https://www.dropbox.com/s/jyp5xctoqyr4asj/hacker%20news%20ca...
76.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
ACTION: Here’s 70+ startups that see carbon dioxide as a profit opportunity: http://airminers.org Climate change will create the first trillionaire.
77.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
That action list sounds great, want to continue building that out on the site. Checking out FFTF now: https://www.fightforthefuture.org
78.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
I had the same thought this morning — but I think it’s just a little flat period in the data, and will continue to climb through the spring. No power in the ‘verse can stop it!
79.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Yeah that sounds like a cool tool. More like Clathrate Fun ! Maybe turn it into a game haha. Anything else you’re curious about regarding climate change?
80.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Woa, that would be cool! Any suggestions for theoretical points you’d like to see? GitHub repo: https://github.com/giving-a-fuck-about-climate-change
81.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
“No One Gives a Fuck About Climate Change” was inspired by the awesome Coinbase charts: http://titojankowski.com/no-one-gives-a-fck-about-climate-ch... Coinbase is great!!
82.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
or maybe a tool to model the data? We want to make it more interactive. Pac Man for carbon would be a cool game using the data :D
83.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
this guy gets it! What about putting a line up at 500 or 600 ppm for a “critical level”?
84.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Great suggestion, thanks! We will expand upon that in our Data Sources section, and also improve the labeling on the graph.
85.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Any suggestions for actions we can guide visitors towards? We’re a bunch of hackers and coders, and that’s who this site is for. Maybe there’s other open source projects that need development help?
86.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
ooo good point! Will fix. Thanks!
87.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Good perspective! I hear you on people screaming and freaking out about climate, we have too many of those already. That’s part of the inspiration for Carbon Doomsday. The skulls escalate it more to a Monty-python type of violence and humor
88.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
1) good point! Suggestions for a better tagline? 3) We’ll get that added! 4) The yearly up-down is the most common question I get! Cool guesses on why even though they’re wrong — like maybe air conditioning usage? I’m split - is there a way
89.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
The jaggy chart sparks my curiousity. Why is it a jaggy mess on the month scale? The world already has enough super-processed, tell-me-what-to-think climate data.
90.
▲
by
titojankowski
9y ago
Trees and plants die off in the fall/winter, and grow back in the spring/summer. Longer answer here from Scripps/UCSD: https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/2013/06/04/wh...
More ›