Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tines
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
You say that the optimal state of society is for everyone to apply programming and logic etc. but the obvious final result of these developments is that no one will.
32.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
Not really, the `any` type doesn't let you perform any operation on it with runtime dispatch like dynamic typing does. Moving logic into json isn't a language feature.
33.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
Funny how all these dynamically typed languages are gradually becoming typed, but none of the statically typed languages are gradually becoming untyped.
34.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
Ah, then they’re implementing needless features! What’s worse! lol
35.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
Ah, I guess to err isn't human after all :)
36.
▲
Can we have a feature to hide post karma?
1 points
by
tines
4mo ago
|
3 comments
37.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
You added the word "want", the OP said "need". "We don't ever expect to add X" implies "we don't think we need X."
38.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
Whether they made a good decision or not, or changed their mind or not, is beside the point (I think they did, and they did!). I was merely replying to the claim that > They didn't say they never wanted to do generics, but that they
39.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
The OP didn't mention generics or generic methods :) They referred to something that was added, after the Go team didn't anticipate adding it. Sounds like a fair point to me!
40.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
I'm not mad, I'm a proponent of stronger type systems. I'm just correcting the record about > They didn't say they never wanted to do generics, but that they did want to take their time and do them right.
41.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
“Opt-in by default” = opt-out?
42.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
Hi! I'm a human being that is trying to understand the world and make friends along the way. I see you are too! Pleased to meet you. You asked the question > Where did "they" say "we" didn't need generics? A
43.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
From another commenter here: > The post quotes the Go FAQ as saying, "we do not anticipate that Go will ever add generic methods".
44.
▲
by
tines
4mo ago
From another commenter here: > The post quotes the Go FAQ as saying, "we do not anticipate that Go will ever add generic methods".
45.
▲
by
tines
5mo ago
"In Minecraft" doesn't mean what it used to. When somebody wrote an 8-bit CPU literally "in Minecraft" it used to be badass. Now it's just a game addon.
46.
▲
by
tines
5mo ago
Pretty interesting, but what’s the reason of being for Fil-C?
47.
▲
by
tines
5mo ago
It does: > Geography. Jeffrey Sachs and others have long argued that geography is destiny: landlocked, tropical, distant-from-markets countries face structural penalties through transport costs, disease burden, and weak agricultural cond
48.
▲
by
tines
5mo ago
The issue for me is that I seem to really "page out" parts of my life that aren't relevant to the situation I'm in. If I were to sincerely answer the "how are you" question, I would have to pause for ten or twe
49.
▲
by
tines
5mo ago
This line again.
50.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
That’s a pretty non sequitur. Nobody said he wasn’t concerned with ROI. He’s said that not every decision is based on ROI.
51.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
The internet has objectively made life worse, and the people who say it hasn't haven't experienced the alternatives. Many people will never know true joy because of the internet.
52.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
The above posts forgot the word "legitimate" before "monopoly": a state is defined as the entity that has the legitimate monopoly on violence within a defined geographic area. A state can cease to have the legitimate m
53.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
Yeah, that doesn't mean it's not a bad thing.
54.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
TIL!
55.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
Two "insure" typos?
56.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
We should make it easier for them to suck less. It's like providing free needles. Druggies gonna drug, might as well help them drug safely :)
57.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
You're being steered without being aware of it.
58.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
Sure, applications are necessary, but why will humans do that?
59.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
But in this future, why will “the most compelling motivations, the clearest explanations, and the most useful maps between intuitions, theorems, and applications” be necessary? Catering to hobbyists?
60.
▲
by
tines
6mo ago
Why do wars tend to devalue the dollar?
More ›