Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
timr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
55 ms
·
781.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
> When speaking in a foreign language, it is commonly the case that you will have a word in mind, but it will be a word from your native language. This can cause problems when, for example, you set up the sentence to use a noun, but the
782.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
Yeah. That's a level beyond -- You're "fluent" enough that you can break the rules -- but that's partially not about language , but about being perceived to be native. Changing the cultural presumption, so to spe
783.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
I started learning Japanese after age 30 (currently around CEFR B1; JLPT N2), but I did it by moving to Japan. I don't know if the "language study", per se , provided the benefit, but the act of moving there so radically tra
784.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
> I still do that classic thing non-fluent speakers do: I'll get halfway through a sentence, realize I don't know a specific word, and have to rephrase my thought more simply. To be clear, I'm far from a beginner, just not
785.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
Yes, I got the exact island mixed up. Not really relevant to my point.
786.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
> Ellis Island was not opened until 1892. Nope. Wrong. That's the new facility. Castle Garden started in the 1850s: https://www.statueofliberty.org/ellis-island/overview-histor... > The 14th Amendment was ad
787.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
> “Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.” So, I assume that you know that's a poem by someone who was engaged in pro-immigrant propaganda? And the en
788.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
Well, if we're predicting the future, here's mine: since they're already basically telegraphing it (and also because it's pretty clear-cut), I predict that they'll overturn the whole thing in a future case, and then
789.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
We agree that if you assume a world where there's no precedent at all, then our system of government doesn't work. Beyond that, no. We also don't agree that that world is the one that we live in.
790.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
Well, that's very cynical and maybe you'll be right, but for now the California AG agrees with me. Per a quote in the WSJ [1]: > California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a co-plaintiff, looked for a silver lining: Red states, whi
791.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
> No, stare decisis is not binding. Nor does it still exist. If it was not binding, did it ever exist? Anyway , there's nothing that binds any Supreme Court to do anything at all. This argument terminates in noise. It's just
792.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
> The Supreme Court has pointedly not ruled or said that the president has the authority to redefine birthright citizenship. Yep, agreed. I already added an edit saying exactly the same thing.
793.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
That's nice rhetoric, but they're not the same issue at all.
794.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
Or, more charitably: the Supreme Court has says that the president has this authority, in this specific area, and your characterization of this as "breaking the law" is not correct. Edit: actually , even that is overstating it. T
795.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
Look, I think I made my only point in the parent comment, but I just want to emphasize that "a panel of actual experts" is rarely the compliment that you seem to think it is. The past few years have been a veritable parade of ex
796.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
The “listen to the experts” types are the same thing, but the opposite pole. Neither qualifies as thinking for yourself.
797.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
It’s only homogenizing your thoughts if you don’t think for yourself. (I realize this might be a weak point for many people.)
798.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
> Wait, so are frequent heat dome events not real and just summer? Or not? That was the claim you made. No, that isn't what I said. Here is what I said: > There have been "heat dome events" every year I've been ali
799.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
Internet searches don't help you if you can't understand the basics of what you're reading. 1) The paper is very clear that it's talking about changes over a 50 year period , which is more than my entire life. It's
800.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
There have been "heat dome events" every year I've been alive. We just didn't call them that , because we used to call this phenomenon "summer". When I was growing up in central Ohio several decades ago, it wo
801.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
We also just had a month of extremely cold summer weather. It was around 60-70 degrees most of last week in New York.
802.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
As a chemist, I can tell you that nearly everything you can think of -- "natural" or otherwise -- has been correlated to some negative outcome, in some organism, by some (usually crappy) study. These get laundered and blurred into
803.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
There are "unmarked", membership-only places, but most likely you just didn't see or understand the sign. Many restaurants and bars are small mom-and-pop places that gain clientele through neighborhood word-of-mouth, and don
804.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
Housing is absolutely an investment vehicle in Japan. It's just that Japan has been economically stagnant for 30+ years, bordering on deflation, and anywhere outside of a first- or second-tier city is effectively dying. Couple that wit
805.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
Hah, hilarious. I used to live not far from this place. [1] I don't know the story behind the structure, but it was a re-purposed storage shed [2] that someone was either subletting or owned outright. Probably the former -- the area is
806.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
For bags specifically, instead of just "banning plastic bags" (which usually leads to dumb outcomes, as GP notes) mandate the use of paper. It drives me up the wall when I go to a store (Target comes to mind; I also see those stup
807.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
> Your order is quite literally causing more traffic congestion, directly, as the car pulls up in front of your apartment and double parks while some guy hand delivers your yogurt or whatever. I told you that I don't use FreshDirect
808.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
In the "I literally didn't insult you and call you names" sense.
809.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
> Some company using it as an excuse to add a junk fee is anecdotal but hardly conclusive. It’s about as much evidence as a hotel saying they didn’t bring me new towels because they care about the environment. Got it. I show you an examp
810.
▲
by
timr
1y ago
It's literally added on a as service fee. You want receipts or something? This is standard stuff -- go ride in a taxi and you'll see the same thing. I encourage you to adopt this level of skepticism to claims on both sides of th
More ›