timmyd

18 ms·

121.
by timmyd 15y ago
@wladimir - yeah I get that but it gets a bit tiring when every medium is the "next email" and now he's "quiting email" and then he'll "return to email" ... blah blah
122.
by timmyd 15y ago
i'm going to be the one to say it - get over yourself MG. twitter was the "end of email". facebook was the "end of email". IM was the "end of email". SMS was email "end of email". Google+ is now the "end of email". no no ... wait wait wait
123.
by timmyd 15y ago
http://gplus.to/
124.
by timmyd 15y ago
Let me clarify .... TL;DR - it's hyperbole. answer the negative. if they didn't get this permission from you - you could sue them for copyright infringement. every service does it. don't freak. Long Version: The key to the text is "non-excl
125.
by timmyd 15y ago
thanks - haven't got an invite yet however ? will let you know if I get one :) [otherwise won't update] thanks ;)
126.
by timmyd 15y ago
I think we all need to appreciate the fact most people use Facebook and/or Twitter because they are agnostic - that is, are not tied or linked to any singular email account. I have a Gmail account - albeit "lay persons" in the tech world -
127.
by timmyd 15y ago
While I haven't used it yet - my biggest difficutly with the service seems to be that Circles actually act as "silos" and are mutually exclusive. That is, you cannot add "Robert Scoble" to different circles such as "friends" and "Tech feed"
128.
by timmyd 15y ago
any chance of an invite ? [timodav]
129.
by timmyd 15y ago
Agree completely. Was a business or rather "non-tech" guy - taught myself HTML4-5/CSS2-3/jQuery + basic C# - coded the entire design, UI etc [and still do it] - and do basically every server install, git, software setup etc etc. This effort
130.
by timmyd 15y ago
I agree also. I also think we all need to appreciate the fact that 99% of the world uses Facebook BECAUSE it is a agnostic platform. I have a Gmail account - most of friends "lay persons" in the tech world - use Yahoo or Hotmail, and sure,
131.
by timmyd 15y ago
love an invite - email is in profile :)
132.
by timmyd 15y ago
Dang none left ?
133.
by timmyd 15y ago
love one too if anyone can assist ? timodav [at] gmail
134.
by timmyd 15y ago
Can you use this microdata with your own CSS/HTML markup or you can't include your own classes ? i.e. your formats must look identical to these ?
135.
3 Lessons in Life at 28(timdavis.com.au)
1 points by timmyd 15y ago|0 comments
136.
by timmyd 15y ago
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype_security My understanding was that some global intelligence organisations can request decryption and that China is doing this actively [see above link]. I also recall reading some time ago that organ
137.
by timmyd 15y ago
"The difference between what you pay for a domain name ($10) and what you sell it for ($6,000,000) is taxable income. Hilarity ensued." Huge problem that most startups don't realise from the get-go. IP transfer is a huge issue and it needs
138.
by timmyd 15y ago
+1 totally agree. think this is the biggest oversight of an otherwise cool service. needs to include your personal website/blog & company site/blog as options
139.
by timmyd 15y ago
I'd agree - it's merely the risk-return equation that needs to be considered at a higher level once your over the "tween" period. There is absolutely nothing stopping you go forth and conquer - however, the probability that you have an inor
140.
by timmyd 15y ago
I'd have to agree. Our tiny startup is interested in adding some HTML5 structure using Modenizer etc but the main problem is the associated effort for not much return yet . It's really a balancing act for time - unfortunately IE7 and IE8 [
141.
by timmyd 16y ago
"Fool me once - shame on you. Fool me twice - shame on me."
142.
by timmyd 16y ago
Sure officially. Unofficially - it's with Microsoft.
143.
by timmyd 16y ago
While I agree that it may very much amount is 'miscommunication'. You would think - that a company which proud itself on having the 'best, brightest and smartest' would do its own due diligence before openly starting a significant legal bat
144.
by timmyd 16y ago
yeah - >$5K - hot upwards or cold downwards ? :)
145.
by timmyd 16y ago
expensive ? seems it would be to get them to produce a video ? are you able to share the cost ?
146.
by timmyd 16y ago
No, by the logic of my argument we should seek to ensure that anti-competitive behavior does not simply trump competitors who offer services of a nature which is just as good if not better "but for" the entrenchment that Google has in consu
147.
by timmyd 16y ago
Can understand the anti-MSFT crowd here but after being smashed so many times for anti-competitiveness [rightly, I might add] - but equally I can appreciate the "mix" of feelings MSFT have. Bing is not even a blimp on Googles radar in Europ
148.
by timmyd 16y ago
In the worlds of William Blackstone "Better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstones_formulation