Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tillinghast
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
tillinghast
8y ago
ifixit.com has _extremely_ well done step-by-step upgrade guides: https://www.ifixit.com/Device/iMac_Intel
62.
▲
by
tillinghast
8y ago
Exactly this. Your name is not your own--your name is a contract between you and the culture / civilization you're dealing with.
63.
▲
by
tillinghast
9y ago
> It probably would work for vehicles, however. For example, electric cars with roofs that are already solar panels—I'm sure adding an antenna to the mix would be fairly trivial.
64.
▲
by
tillinghast
9y ago
Genuinely curious—so non-4k high-DPI displays work fine then?
65.
▲
by
tillinghast
9y ago
> The warning […] is perhaps scary the first time you see it, but then it becomes insignificant as time goes by… Which is exactly why it's dangerous. Granting access like this without a thought to the potential consequences is just
66.
▲
by
tillinghast
9y ago
You can build a database by accepting URLs submitted by users, too. It just baffles me that people willingly install these extensions that—on the tin!—say that they can "Read and change all your data on the websites you visit". IN
67.
▲
by
tillinghast
9y ago
The article title is suspiciously ambiguous. It's almost as if they _wanted_ to encourage outrage and motivate people to click through...
68.
▲
by
tillinghast
9y ago
I think this is brilliant. Culling the herd.
69.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
Beautiful, useful extension! But honestly, who installs (and keeps) extensions like this that require your absolute trust??? "Add CSS Peeper? It can: - Read and change all your data on the websites you visit." Are there really no
70.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
No.
71.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
Niggle: The title should be "How _One_ Man's …", not "How _a_ Man's …". This reflects the actual title of the article, and avoids an ambiguous reading (was this bad math attributed to _men_, or a singular perso
72.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
Which, as far as I know, works on Linux.
73.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
Have you tried GitKraken? https://www.gitkraken.com/ Seems like there's a glut of these apps of late—not that I'm complaining! :-)
74.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
A brilliant troll / piece of entertainment. The author basically reveals it here in Update #3: > Our software has now moved onto PayPal so we know it's safe.
75.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
Presumably it allows you to detect when they've been removed and your hardware has been compromised?
76.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
As a human who is also apparently a leg-humping chihuahua, I just wanted to chime in to say that Noah Webster is a dumbass.
77.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
Oddly coincidental, there was a book released today covering this exact topic in the context of PHP development: http://adamwathan.me/refactoring-to-collections/
78.
▲
by
tillinghast
10y ago
I think the more pertinent question from the example given is: "Did I work for colossal douchebags?"
79.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
They explicitly answer this question in the FAQ (sketchapp.com/support/faq): Is Sketch available for Windows or Linux? Due to the technologies and frameworks exclusive to OS X that Sketch has been built upon, regrettably we are no
80.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
It is curious—however, I have a feeling that the offenders listed in the article aren't bumping up against the limitations of JPEG compression in their bloat. :-)
81.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
> Fuck websites with autoplay (or autoplay-on-hover) videos. It's not just marketing. My personal favorite is how Twitter and (shudder) Facebook are doing this on their timelines now. At least they have the decency to mute the volum
82.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
One could argue that extreme climate swings might make for an _ideal_ development environment. Environmental extremes would better model real-world conditions.
83.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
… or before you make that quick-just-this-once edit to your site's templates via the CMS's wysiwyg editor. Turns out buttfront.net references don't resolve where you think they do.
84.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
Not necessarily in good taste, but… yes. At this time (1996) having an obvious overreaction like this would have appeared to be a joke.
85.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
I think it's a combination of the era and of the specific context. I would suppose that your experience potentially had other extenuating factors that caused you to give the threat more weight. Either way, I don't fault you at all
86.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
This "threat" was made in 1996 (not 2004 as some other commenters are noting—the _thread_ is from 2004). This is a fascinating view into how things have changed between then and now. Honestly, in 1996 you could make a threat like
87.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
Galactagogues, presumably.
88.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
It would be a breakthrough of Gaussian proportions!
89.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
Terrible wordplay, if this is actually the case. The play exactly contradicts the thesis.
90.
▲
by
tillinghast
11y ago
If you make the bottom of the pile accessible in some manner (like with a door), it's more efficient to withdraw the grain from that point due to gravity. Peripherally related, this pyramid talk finally made me look up "critical a
More ›