tilertex

3 ms·

1.
by tilertex 8y ago
I don't think Wikileaks has ever claimed that they publish everything they receive. Maybe they couldn't verify it's legitimacy. Maybe they didn't find the texts of someone's daughter particularly interesting. Maybe
2.
by tilertex 8y ago
Considering Wikileaks is said to have a dead mans switch, there's likely to be at least some unpublished material Wha it includes is really anyone's guess
3.
by tilertex 8y ago
Means the simplest explanation is probably the best. As in, Wikileaks isn't an evil Russian agent Assange/Wikileaks leaked the Podesta emails in the most effective way possible to generate interest and subsequently damage the Clin
4.
by tilertex 8y ago
There's an explanation that makes a lot more sense: Wikileaks leaked the emails of the campaign manager for a candidate that's official stance on Assange was "can't we just drone the guy?" Or, perhaps, as you seem t
5.
by tilertex 9y ago
There's a reason Mark Zuckerberg himself came out and said he's "actually not sure we shouldn't be regulated" and it's not because he has genuine concerns about his users privacy. It's because regulation i
6.
by tilertex 9y ago
Maybe. Maybe not. I think there's a middle ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v
7.
by tilertex 9y ago
Oh ok great! I was worried I'd have to get elbow deep into Kubernetes before upgrading Thanks guys, you're doing awesome work
8.
by tilertex 9y ago
So does this mean Cattle is dead in 2.0 and Kubernetes is the only orchestrator available? That would be a shame because I decided to use Cattle because it seemed simpler and lighter that something like Kubernetes.