tieTYT

32 ms·

271.
by tieTYT 13y ago
This article is written for someone who already understands the old issue that this is fixing (there's nothing wrong with writing it like that). But for someone like me that doesn't understand when you need to use this `bind()` s
272.
by tieTYT 13y ago
I'm also building a javascript game (I'm using canvas and 2d images). All the comments here are freaking me out a bit. They all keep saying that html5 games are too slow. My game has many significant features done and it seems
273.
by tieTYT 13y ago
> no amount of raw dollars can compensate for that ability I'll play the devil's advocate here: Wouldn't the raw dollar amount it costs to work a day compensate for that?
274.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Your second paragraph is very relevant to my feelings. "Same actions, new background" is pretty much how I felt when playing. I think I may have gotten to act 2.5, too.
275.
by tieTYT 13y ago
I like the swagger layout. http://swagger.wordnik.com/#!/pet Their developer documentation is kind of tricky to figure out though.
276.
by tieTYT 13y ago
I haven't played D1/2/3 but I've played torchlight 1-2. I don't like TL2. For some reason when I play TL2 I'm very aware that the next thing I'll be doing is the thing I'm already doing. Playing the
277.
by tieTYT 13y ago
> Limiting in-game communication systems severely I haven't played either game. Was this just done because they didn't have enough time to make it better? > Penalizing players for playing in groups How did they accomplish t
278.
by tieTYT 13y ago
I'm curious as someone who has never played the game: What else do they need to fix? I've only heard complaints about the auction house
279.
by tieTYT 13y ago
So javascript is getting built in support for map() before java gets it? :(
280.
by tieTYT 13y ago
I think the article was well written. This is the standard example to use for a Trie. But I never run into any scenarios except for this that make me think, "A Trie is a good fit for this!" What are some other examples where Tr
281.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Do you happen to know if he charged from the get-go?
282.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Really good info. I'd love (and even prefer) to release my game today so I can get feedback earlier. But in its current state (shitty graphics, no tutorial, 50% of the intended features implemented) I'm lost as to if that would
283.
by tieTYT 13y ago
How much of this applies to creating a game? Honest question.
284.
by tieTYT 13y ago
I disagree. That's not obvious. It's relatively easy to explain parallelism, concurrency, recursion, currying, idempotency, the visitor pattern, etc. etc. This is different. MVC names are really annoying and poorly chosen. E
285.
by tieTYT 13y ago
I'm not saying put it in models I'm saying it's part of the Model of MVC. If you've got a class called FooBarService that takes a model and executes business logic on it, that FooBarService can still be part of the
286.
by tieTYT 13y ago
No that's what the model is for. The controller is just for handling framework specific input. It takes the framework specific part, puts it in a form that the business logic can understand (eg: business logic shouldn't even kno
287.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Wrong. Business logic is part of the model. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Patterns-Enterprise-Application-Archit... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93cont... http://st
288.
by tieTYT 13y ago
The original flaw, if you ask me, is the naming. WTF is a model? WTF is a controller? WTF is a view? You can (and I have) explained this to a newbie for an hour and they still won't get it. They may as well have named it 123. At l
289.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Even if you're right, this isn't really useful because what you're saying is not actionable. I don't have a "use discipline" switch I can just turn on. Learning discipline comes from doing things the wrong wa
290.
by tieTYT 13y ago
It never crashed for me.
291.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Thank you, Sir. I went down that route by wondering if "space" or "enter" would do it with no luck. I stopped short at arrow keys.
292.
by tieTYT 13y ago
I'm sorry this is off topic, but that slideshare ui is so annoying. Why doesn't it progress one slide when I click on the slide? I hate how I have to precisely click on that tiny "next" button to go to the next slide.
293.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Did you really mean to use the phrase "complete refactor" here? AFAIK, refactoring means modifying your code without modifying features. That's very different from a "complete rewrite".
294.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Yeah, if you click that "?" image on the upper right, it explains how it works. Most unusual UI I've ever seen. That text field should just have a button called "submit". That would be the most obvious thing to d
295.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Just FYI, if I were in your boat I'd probably feel the same way. I chose my words very carefully: 1. I compared bare-bones IDEs because I know resharper levels the playing field. 2. When I said, "All things being equal (that incl
296.
by tieTYT 13y ago
If I'm so clueless, why don't you enlighten me by telling me what makes VS better than Intellij IDEA? I suspect a bit of the Blub paradox (applied to IDEs instead of programming languages) is occurring here. I don't see what
297.
by tieTYT 13y ago
> My problem with Clojure is that ... Exceptions are often meaningless and trying to debug someone else’s code is challenging since the language itself is complex and it can be extended by macros. Finally, the Clojure community isn’t rea
298.
by tieTYT 13y ago
Yes but I thought everyone uses VS for .NET development? Am I wrong about that? If I'm right, your point is kind of moot.
299.
by tieTYT 13y ago
> C# > We have a better IDE than the Java guys Biased Java guy here. Completely disagree. Yes VS lets you build nice UIs with drag and drop. But if you compare bare bones Intellij IDEA to bare bones Visual Studio, Intellij IDEA win
300.
by tieTYT 13y ago
First, yes: You can only tell someone, "Don't reinvent the wheel" if the wheel has already been invented. Re: your last sentence: Isn't it even more likely that it could end up being a complete waste of time and effort a

More ›