Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
thunky
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
421.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
It would only beep inside the car. So if other people are driving and it's beeping then they should drive better so they don't annoy their passengers (you). The point of the beep is to get the driver's attention so they slow
422.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
You could easily avoid the "noise pollution" by driving safely.
423.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
The point you continue to miss (or ignore) is that equivalence doesn't matter. Hamas is bad. Israel is bad. Neither is going to admit it. Ever. But since you asked: https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/unimagina
424.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
I didn't know what you're talking about. I never once commented on either of their goals, or who was right or wrong. That was my entire point. So either you are not following the conversation or you are trolling. Have a nice day.
425.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> The point is you would not be correct. You know I'm wrong before I even say anything? That's...impressive.
426.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
You're doing it again. For every point you make about Hamas I could match you with one about Israel. But what's the point?
427.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> The difference is I'm correct and you are not. This is the kind of thinking that keeps this insanity going on forever. You're demonstrating my point: we've lost track of "who started it" and it doesn't eve
428.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
Interesting, thanks. From wikipedia: The Israeli High Court of Justice ruled in 2002 that refusal to serve was legal on the grounds of unqualified pacifism, but "selective refusal" which accepted some duties and not others was il
429.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
[flagged]
430.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> Citizens have the option to do Sherut Leumi instead of IDF I'm not sure if that's true. I looked it up and it seems that males need a Ptor (exemption) from the Army. But they may be likely to choose IDF anyway due to the cult
431.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> because Hamas invaded Israel And why did they do that? It's like gang warfare, never ending. It started long before Hamas and we've all lost track of why so finger pointing only makes it worse.
432.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> just driving dangerously Why don't we have a feature to brake or at least beep when tailgating? 2 car lengths at 80 mph is not ok.
433.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
Tailing off the pessimism part: A lack of conviction that the future is bright is enough to make the future dark.
434.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
I was skeptical that you knew with confidence what made a resume fake, other than it being "too good to be true". Which I don't blame you for, it's an optimization. But it also means that the perfect candidate, while pro
435.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> the resumes the LLM likes the most will be the "fake" applicants > the strongest matches are the fakest applicants How do you know that you didn't filter out the perfect candidate? And did you tell the LLM what makes
436.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
I'd like to see the before and after questions because it seems possible that the layman's version was less exact and therefore interpreted differently, even if the intention was the same. Which, can happen with humans too.
437.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
Odd take. YouTube has just about anything you might be interested in, in abundance. Even if it is "mostly crap" there would probably still be more non-crap than you could consume in your lifetime.
438.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
And youth/health. Trump may think he's on top of the world but I bet he'd trade it all away to be 25 rather than on his last leg.
439.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> modern framework Modern usually doesn't last long.
440.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> So either there's going to be a cut in benefits and/or the retirement age will be bumped up Or...raise the contribution limit which fixes the whole thing easily without having to screw over the people that paid in and just wa
441.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> What does it mean to hold "a company" liable? It means that the company is sued and is responsible for damages. > decision makers at companies can make the company behave unethically or even illegally and suffer no repercu
442.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> I've been using Ruby for over 10 years Maybe after a decade or two I wouldn't care, but as someone who has only used Ruby casually I would steer clear of it for anything serious, largely due to the lack of namespaces.
443.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> which human(s) do we hold accountable for these decisions? Personally I'd be satisfied holding the company as a whole liable rather than a single person.
444.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
That's fair but I was referering to the humans that delegate "business decisions" to computers, which is what I thought the context was... For example, if American Airlines uses a computer to help decide who gets refunds, the
445.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
That's why you hold the humans that run the computer accountable.
446.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
Workday said in a statement it was "honored to partner with OPM" to modernize its HR systems via the 12-month $342,200 contract . Only $342k? Yes it is: https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_24322625C000
447.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
> Will we see ads being integrated into AI response? Already exists. Go to bing.com/chat and type something like "i'm looking for a nice suitcase".
448.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
Yeah they can "change the code" like that, like someone can change the api code. But the key point is that they're choosing to change the behavior without changing the code, because it's possible and presumably more effi
449.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
I like WB as much as the next guy and while he was wildly successfully at making money, he hasn't really done anything else. His main motivation has always been to make money for himself and his shareholders, so why would we expect any
450.
▲
by
thunky
1y ago
Django is similar but done better IMO.
More ›