throwupper247

7 ms·

31.
by throwupper247 11y ago
For a game you could precalc the collision boxes as polygons or whatever your models use.
32.
by throwupper247 11y ago
More like, it is open source, but it's not free open source?
33.
by throwupper247 11y ago
I was trying to tell you that there is a difference between what someone thinks about something's value and the actual value of that thing. It's called subjectivity and objectivity and I feel like your first comment in this thread
34.
by throwupper247 11y ago
What? Justin Webb granted the licence, NaturalMotion Limited explicitly didn't. NaturalMotion has a licence and that probably includes their veto on any following licence given by Justin. I'm not a lawyer or particularly strong wi
35.
by throwupper247 11y ago
You keep speaking of "the outside", implying that there is any outside that's inaccessable to us. This's not scientific. It's not mumbojumbo either, but it's just not provable. It's glaringly obvious, too.
36.
by throwupper247 11y ago
No, I don't know. If 99% water solution just has to satisfy thirst, then a 1% zyankali solution doesn't kill, is it? It's a bad comparison, because I really don't know what else coffee brew consists of exactly, but you p
37.
by throwupper247 11y ago
>My comment had nothing to do with advocating coffee My comment did. You can't just reply to the whole comment without considering that part.
38.
by throwupper247 11y ago
>for the sake of the argument That's begging the question. There's researchers writing a 18 page report about a 100 manyears of development and you stumble in here without really reading it, saying it's wrong on account of
39.
by throwupper247 11y ago
No, hedonism is not true. It's a deceptive misconception of what values are a good guideline for a sustainable life. I was getting at the common notion that hedonists don't want to work, because it's no fun, which is obviousl
40.
by throwupper247 11y ago
It's disgustingly bitter, so much most can only bare it with milk and sugar. Your subjective evidence is not convincing, even less as I was implying coffee had an addictive and hence behavioral conditioning effect, part of which comes
41.
by throwupper247 11y ago
That's just sad how much you are missing my point, all the while defending the coffee that your text kind of reads like you had too much before reading.
42.
by throwupper247 11y ago
Hedonism is your ultimate phylosophical truth, is it? Strawberries are hardly as heavily industrialised as coffee, calling your relationship with a hot bevarage a romantic one is doubtful. I am as pessimistic as your logic is flawed. There
43.
by throwupper247 11y ago
E_CONTEXT: Please elaborate, I don't understand where the question is coming from.
44.
by throwupper247 11y ago
Selling something that people want isn't equal to providing value. Let me be pessimistic: coffee doesn't provide a positive value, because it's a drug that get's people addicted however little and subliminal. Maybe that
45.
by throwupper247 11y ago
The discussed paper is http://www.nature.com/articles/srep18112 "The global landscape of cognition: hierarchical aggregation as an organizational principle of human cortical networks and functions" Consciousn
46.
by throwupper247 11y ago
Is it also impossible to research matter, because we can't seperate the matter we study ... ? Am I missing the analogy?