throwmeawaydddy

4 ms·

1.
by throwmeawaydddy 5y ago
Yeah, you're close on the cut (varied from 12.5% to 25% depending on purchase types). The revenue was nowhere near 1.2B. (I wrote the below in another comment, but it's relevant to this comment): Both of the claims in my original
2.
by throwmeawaydddy 5y ago
Just to chime in on this one. You're obviously right mathematically. Both of the claims in my original comment are correct as stated: * Roughly 20K active creators (VAL_A). * An average monthly payout to creators of $5K (VAL_B). HOWEVE
3.
by throwmeawaydddy 5y ago
I felt obligated to reply to this comment, because you're correct at interpreting my intent. I should have been cleared with my numbers considering the audience (HN is a stat-aware place it appears!) Both of my numbers were accurate as
4.
by throwmeawaydddy 5y ago
Just to clarify, those two numbers are both accurate as stated (there were roughly 20K active creators and the average monthly payout was amount 5K). However, those numbers can't be multiplied to get the monthly payout total. 1. A larg
5.
by throwmeawaydddy 5y ago
> c) Was this done as blackmail? There is a somewhat common dating site scam where someone gets you to friend them on FB, and then to sext with them-- then they threaten to send the material to your FB friends. I'd imagine OF girls
6.
by throwmeawaydddy 5y ago
Fire up the throwaway! Not 100% related to the article, but directly related. I worked as developer for a product in the same niche ("democratizing adult content"). I spent almost 2 years working on the frontend, devops, and build