throwme2024

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwme2024 2y ago

   > I'm not sure why the EFF would be schizophrenic for disputing that. They don't dispute that. That's what's so weird. The argument boils down to "historic border surveillance tools have been pork-barrel debacles
2. 2.▲
   by throwme2024 2y ago

   This seems in line with the EFF's principles - they've always been strongly against the use of electronics for surveillance. I agree with you that this article left me with a weird taste, though - in this case, I think that the th
3. 3.▲
   by throwme2024 2y ago

   This article complains a lot about previous-generation, cancelled projects, but doesn't really investigate what's going on with the current surveillance towers or investigate anything at all, really. The linked NBC article explain