throwlastone

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwlastone 6y ago

   Those "facts" are about as relevant to dispelling the allegations as is the "fact" that a table has four legs. The facts are there to support an argument. The fact that only 3 people filed a formal complain isn't st
2. 2.▲
   by throwlastone 6y ago

   Counter whatever evidence is presented with facts. The same way you make any argument. "You can't prove a negative" is mostly an imaginary problem, you don't need to prove anything, you need to convince people that your
3. 3.▲
   by throwlastone 6y ago

   You respond with specific facts and supporting evidence, not nebulous dismissals, which is how guilty companies respond.
4. 4.▲
   by throwlastone 6y ago

   Lies are countered with facts, not generic dismissals. The post is textbook PR pointing to some unspecified inaccuracy which is supposed to cast doubt on the substance of the story. Then self-investigation and self-exoneration. Every compan