throwawuy222

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwawuy222 11y ago

   Is there any linters available for IDE's to ensure conformance with a vanilla ruleset of scala? If that existed, scala would be able to shape itself up nicely.
2. 2.▲
   by throwawuy222 11y ago

   For those who don't understand: Scalaz is an additional layer of syntax and tricks on top of what is already there. It seems to have quite a lot of power! implicit val option = new Traverse[Option] with MonadPlus[Option] {
3. 3.▲
   by throwawuy222 11y ago

   There is such a thing as idiomatic scala? How? Care to elaborate?
4. 4.▲
   by throwawuy222 11y ago

   Basically I've seen this in person. Scala was driving the last startup I was in to the ground. The thing that fascinates me is scala is like an art. It's like a new Obfuscated Perl Contest , but for functional programming. It doe
5. 5.▲
   by throwawuy222 11y ago

   He says the compiler implementation is a mess. he's still a contributor and involved in the language. The implementation is a mess because the specification permits so much grammar and syntactic idioms. The moving target and bl
6. 6.▲
   by throwawuy222 11y ago

   This isn't an accurate depiction of what scala ends up looking like. If all scala stuck to simple idioms like in the example, it'd be an excellent language.
7. 7.▲
   by throwawuy222 11y ago

   (throwaaway here) Before you waste the next few months of your life learning a corrupt programming language: - Typesafe co-founder quits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiJycy6dFSQ - https://vimeo.com/64716