throwawayx50223

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwawayx50223 3y ago

   > If a branch is rebased, then comments on code that was changed get lost That's probably more related to UX than git itself. I remember Bitbucket (also git) handling these situations better and conversations were much easier to fol
2. 2.▲
   by throwawayx50223 3y ago

   I haven't used Bitbucket for a long time, but from what I remember it had a superior merge/pr tool. It was much easier to follow review comments after a rebase or commit. Is that still the case?
3. 3.▲
   by throwawayx50223 3y ago

   That matches my experience too. SVN and CVS was very common as far as I remember. More developers probably use version control now than before, but version control was considered part of "best practice" before git was released. Th
4. 4.▲
   by throwawayx50223 3y ago

   > Personally I'd rather be working on a system that's massively important with less flashy tech, than building more inconsequential apps with the latest frameworks. I am the same type of person. Solving a problem and creating a
5. 5.▲
   by throwawayx50223 3y ago

   I probably fit the description of a dark matter developer. I don't have any public github repos and don't feel comfortable blogging. I do read a lot of blogs to keep me up to date with the current trends and try to get some in dep