throwaway_dflka

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwaway_dflka 6y ago

   It's an obstacle to suing Doordash for trademark infringement, which is what you would typically do when someone is doing business in your name without your permission.
2. 2.▲
   by throwaway_dflka 6y ago

   Those prohibitions have nothing to do with the original seller asserting his copyright or trademarks or patents, which is what the first sale doctrine prevents. They're just requirements for anyone who is selling food to the public. Th
3. 3.▲
   by throwaway_dflka 6y ago

   To speak more precisely, the first sale doctrines prevent the original seller from asserting intellectual property rights (copyright, patent, trademark) as a basis to prohibit resell. I was writing an internet comment, not a legal brief!
4. 4.▲
   by throwaway_dflka 6y ago

   It's an interesting question. I suspect there's some trademark arguments to be made regarding confusion as to who is providing the product and service and whose failures any mistakes reflect. That kind of attribution, and the prod