throwawayWSQA

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwawayWSQA 6y ago

   As an aside, about bullets. Sure, the military has access to more powerful rounds. Aircraft cannons, for example. But they don't typically load the soldier's rifles with rounds more powerful than what a civilian can buy. - Soldier
2. 2.▲
   by throwawayWSQA 6y ago

   "I don't know where the US police falls on that spectrum, though reading US news makes it seem like they do have some serious issues currently. " Well that's the problem, isn't it? You read news coverage of the US.
3. 3.▲
   by throwawayWSQA 6y ago

   If you re-read my comment, you'll see that "administrating sedatives to humans safely" is specifically what I consider irrelevant.
4. 4.▲
   by throwawayWSQA 6y ago

   what and why? Specifically, what and why is insane and how is being an anesthesiologist relevant? Note, I don't think police should inject anyone with a substance (personally, I'd rather get shot with a bullet than involuntarily s
5. 5.▲
   by throwawayWSQA 6y ago

   1. "Soldiers use even better bullets" Almost universally not true. The Geneva convention prohibits many types of bullets that are allowed for civilian use. Hollow points, for example. And there are good reasons why they're al