throwaway82652

30 ms·

1. 241.▲
   by throwaway82652 5y ago

   >Stopped using Debian a long time ago >I'll be using a different version of Linux. I'm not disagreeing with the rest of your reply, but these are nonsensical statements in context. It's presenting an assumption that the
2. 242.▲
   by throwaway82652 5y ago

   I hope it's possible to relax that capability in the kernel somehow, that may be a next step for someone working on sandboxing.
3. 243.▲
   by throwaway82652 5y ago

   Good point, that's very helpful to know.
4. 244.▲
   by throwaway82652 5y ago

   >I always look forward to condescending GNOME apologists to reply to my comments. Stop. This is nonsense and adds nothing to the discussion, it's like if I started off immediately dismissing you as a "GTK3 apologist" or so
5. 245.▲
   by throwaway82652 5y ago

   I was under the impression the X11 and dbus sandboxing was done with Xpra and xdg-dbus-proxy, which are not part of firejail.
6. 246.▲
   by throwaway82652 5y ago

   I don't know why it says that, it's explicitly not: https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap/blob/34a8c8bc870783... Distros without user namespaces will probably still ship the SUID version though.
7. 247.▲
   by throwaway82652 5y ago

   My main issue with Firejail is that it still uses a SUID binary, compared to bwrap which has supported rootless operation for a while now. If you have to use SUID I think it's no better than using the same functionality in Docker or sy
8. 248.▲
   by throwaway82652 5y ago

   Normally I'm a Mac/Linux user, but last time I tried Windows it hid all the icons by default. They used to show them in older versions but they do not anymore, probably because everyone including the OS vendor itself uses it as
9. 249.▲
   by throwaway82652 5y ago

   >complex flexbox layouting, theming, and animations The only way to implement those things in an immediate mode framework is to cache a lot of state. I haven't found this to be any easier, once the layout becomes complex enough the
10. 250.▲
    by throwaway82652 5y ago

    >the Inter font issue comes to mind I don't see anything objectionable there. Pay particular attention to this response: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2331#not... Sadly it&#
11. 251.▲
    by throwaway82652 5y ago

    I agree the quality of packages on flathub is pretty inconsistent. That part sucks. They're all made by third party packagers. You could make a curated repository but that would just be taking flathub and removing a lot of packages.
12. 252.▲
    by throwaway82652 5y ago

    >Why are there no icons in my tray for my background apps (steam, slack, etc)? I understand the other ones but I don't understand this one. The Android tray does exactly this, background icons on the bar are a mobile feature. If you
13. 253.▲
    by throwaway82652 5y ago

    I'm sorry but most of this comment is a lot of nonsense. You're certainly allowed to disagree, but when you approach people with comments about their own work that are factually wrong, you'll get corrected. You're confus
14. 254.▲
    by throwaway82652 5y ago

    >It wasn't even acknowledged as a bug in the beginning, even after screenshots with clear signs of regression were posted. Matthias Clasen closed the bug report saying it wasn't a bug but an intended feature. There's reall
15. 255.▲
    by throwaway82652 5y ago

    You're under the impression that they can compromise here, when this is false. That's a misreading of that comment. The "compromise" used by snap is to just not have sandboxing at all. Mounting /bin fundamentally br