throwaway698585

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwaway698585 3y ago

   You are likely confusing what is better termed "PCIe passthrough" with virtual functions wherein one physical GPU presents itself on the PCIe bus as (dozen's in the case of SR-IOV or thousands in the case of SIOV) of GPU func
2. 2.▲
   by throwaway698585 3y ago

   It's not difficult but it misses the point. SIOV supports 1k's of VF's because that's what you need if you want a sandboxed app-per-VM security model. When statically compiled VM's are just as performant as containe
3. 3.▲
   by throwaway698585 3y ago

   GVT-g was intel's first crack at virtualization and is now abandoned. It was supplanted by Intel supporting SR-IOV which itself was succeeded by intel's SIOV. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en&
4. 4.▲
   by throwaway698585 3y ago

   The big record label's negotiated their own streaming payouts, which is largely why the payout rate is now so low for everyone else.
5. 5.▲
   by throwaway698585 3y ago

   >Correct me if I am wrong on this, but to me, it would seem that something like VirGL would still serve a purpose with wider spreader full SR-IOV support on consumer GPUs, as VirGL could find application in many scenarios where a GPU ven
6. 6.▲
   by throwaway698585 3y ago

   VirGL is a poor solution to the pressing problem of virtualized graphics. It only really exists because the hardware makers AMD/Intel/Nvidia in their infinite greed refuse to support VFIO on all GPU's like how IOMMU is suppor