throwaway482945

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwaway482945 2y ago

   Does anyone truly understand these models? I don't think we have any proofs about the upper limits of what LLMs are capable of. How can you be so confident? To be clear, I am not saying there are no limits to what LLMs can do, I just
2. 2.▲
   by throwaway482945 2y ago

   I think you can't really win here with camelCase. Both look bad to me.
3. 3.▲
   by throwaway482945 2y ago

   Would allowing spaces in identifiers even introduce any ambiguity in most languages? I think the only languages I've seen where it would matter are functional languages. e.g. I think it'd be possible to write a Python program us
4. 4.▲
   by throwaway482945 2y ago

   Python's facilities for calling subprocesses are pretty inconvenient compared to bash IMO. It defaults to binary output instead of UTF-8 so I almost always have to set an option for that. I wind up having to define threads in order to
5. 5.▲
   by throwaway482945 2y ago

   If America doesn't create it, China will.
6. 6.▲
   by throwaway482945 2y ago

   Is it really faster? I thought firecracker boot times were something like 100ms. LightVM claims 2.3ms?
7. 7.▲
   by throwaway482945 2y ago

   I wouldn't consider the original 100K to be part of the expected value since that's money they already have, not money they're winning...
8. 8.▲
   by throwaway482945 2y ago

   Is their approach different from this one from 5 years ago? https://youtu.be/cO6-SL3bMZg?si=_pVdOLNdej2pjDnT