throwaway382938

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by throwaway382938 4y ago

   I didn't say it's a good reason to not release the models, it's just why I think they aren't being released. You should strive to respond to the strongest interpretation of what you read and not the weakest one.
2. 2.▲
   by throwaway382938 4y ago

   I didn't say it's a good reason to not release the models, it's just why I think they aren't being released. You should strive to respond to the strongest interpretation of what you read and not the weakest one.
3. 3.▲
   by throwaway382938 4y ago

   I didn't say it's a good reason to not release the models, it's just why I think they aren't being released. You should strive to respond to the strongest interpretation of what you read and not the weakest one.
4. 4.▲
   by throwaway382938 4y ago

   > Is this true, have you seen it or just heard about it? I have seen it. SD is capable of generating CP that is indistinguishable from a real photograph with correct anatomy. > I also did not seen any porn scene generated by AI There
5. 5.▲
   by throwaway382938 4y ago

   Personal opinion: These models are capable of generating photorealistic child pornography. That's why they're not being released. I have no evidence to back this up, other than anecdotal. All the hand waving vague posts from SD, D