throwaway29303

30 ms·

271.
by throwaway29303 6y ago
>All these strict (implicit) social rules are ridiculous, and I am not interested in that kind of toxic environment, where a simple question results in inter personal conflict. You can't really expect navigating a world where everyt
272.
by throwaway29303 6y ago
How is mathematical exploration and discovery related to asking a fellow student, whom you don't know, through e-mail, on a date? If I were in your shoes I wouldn't have sent any more e-mails after not receiving a response from th
273.
by throwaway29303 6y ago
Tell me, OP, what did you learn, if anything, from this whole ordeal?
274.
by throwaway29303 6y ago
Or maybe this is our generation's Project Blue Book. Exciting, regardless.
275.
by throwaway29303 6y ago
I suspect it's about their moat. It's always about someone's moat.
276.
by throwaway29303 6y ago
I don't believe it is, your best bet right now is to change to another browser.
277.
by throwaway29303 6y ago
I believe they'll still be able to do those things, though. It's just a matter of time. The slowing and spying that is. It won't be as easy, but I believe it'll be feasible. It's the typical arms race. Or as last re
278.
by throwaway29303 6y ago
>The decline of polymathy, then, suggests a broader crisis. For Burke, it is a crisis of too much information. The seventeenth century was a “golden age of polymaths”, as explorers found new regions, the scientific method flourished, and
279.
by throwaway29303 6y ago
What is Borg written in? C, C++ or Go?
280.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
I just finished reading this and I'm weeping. I'm so sorry.
281.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
They ought not to. Astrology is pseudoscience. You should checkout James Randi or "The Amazing Randi." Here's one of his videos about it. He has been debunking a lot of pseudoscience topics for a long time now. https:/
282.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
https://twitter.com/Mike_Pence/status/1237503086731632640
283.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
Those are fair efforts. Good job. How about giving the research community FREE access (until infection rate starts to decline?) to your TPU pod infra to accelerate their efforts? I'm aware of DeepMind's efforts and the chinese se
284.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
Apparently they're doing something about it. https://deepmind.com/research/open-source/computational-pred...
285.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
It'd be nice if Deepmind's AlphaFold could lay a helping hand. ;) https://deepmind.com/blog/article/AlphaFold-Using-AI-for-sci...
286.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
Fear isn't a new paradigm. It has long been established that media outlets, religion, terrorism, ads, etc use(s) fear as a means of control. I suggest watching "Bowling for Columbine"--here's a notable excerpt: https:&#
287.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
It's too late. Google, et al have opened the metaphorical Pandora's Jar long ago. The race to the top - especially between countries and with different views - will not stop anyone. It's in everyone's interest to get the
288.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
Google haven't veered off their modus operandi since, maybe, its inception. Most people would say they're an ad company but if you look closely they're a patent hoarder and billion user product/service chaser. Beyond it
289.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
But if the point of Machine Learning is to generalise a given dataset, wouldn't a particular pattern (the one one wishes to forget) be (unintentionally) found given other unrelated and/or similar patterns?
290.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
That's a highly complex problem, IMHO; since it involves lots of variables and variability. And, quite honestly, I doubt there's ever going to be a proper way to solve it. But here are some of my observations: - Everyone's o
291.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
If I were in your shoes I'd use other products/services instead. The problem with the "billion user audience" products/services is that they do not have enough people (if any) as support when stuff like this happens
292.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
Quite amusing. I guess the news about "move fast and break things" death were greatly exaggerated.
293.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
Given enough time; I'd say something that's similar to Google's Glass or a physical sensor stuck into one's brain (Neuralink). What's holding back these advancements is the way companies monetise these ideas--the fa
294.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
>Google is citing its investment in the quality of user experience as the main driver of this initiative (...) This move is such an obvious attempt to push businesses/users to their other properties - such as Cloud Platform or AMP -
295.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
>How can we build machine learning systems that can handle millions of tasks, and that can learn to successfully accomplish new tasks automatically? Personally, I believe the answer to this question is going to take a very long time to a
296.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
Although what I'm about to say doesn't justify his behaviour, but have you ever considered the following: a) He's aware of his tone, but probably bald tired of reading stuff that can be (and in this case is) perceived as an a
297.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
The average person doesn't care and/or doesn't understand and/or doesn't care enough to understand how these systems and the data economy works. I've been trying to explain this to friends and family since a de
298.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
Indeed, but that wouldn't explain the pilots reports actually looking at the object moving at those speeds. Peeps keep insisting on the device's malfunction or whatever, but keep forgetting that the pilots actually looked at the o
299.
by throwaway29303 7y ago
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/may/12/facebook-...